Neighbourhood Change · Neighbourhood Change in a Comparative Context: a Social-Mobility Approach
Horizon 2020 — Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
- Duration
- 2016-09-12 → 2018-07-11
- EU contribution
- €162,799
- Participants
- 1
- Scheme
- MSCA-IF
Lines connect the coordinator with its partners.
Results in brief
Neighbourhood Change in a Comparative Context: a Social-Mobility Approach
The socioeconomic status of urban neighbourhoods can change over time due to multiple processes. Some of these processes operate at the urban level, which cause neighbourhoods to change relative to one another within the urban area. The movement of neighbourhoods up and down the urban socioeconomic hierarchy is often related to their life cycle and stage of development; many neighbourhoods decline as they age, and at some point might be subject to renewal processes which lead to an upward trajectory. Beyond the urban level, neighbourhood socioeconomic conditions are also affected by structural processes that involve regional, national and global levels. These processes can generate changes in the distribution of socioeconomic characteristics of the population in an urban area, which can translate into neighbourhood change. Two different ‘structural’ effects change the distribution of neighbourhood average incomes in the urban area: The ‘growth/decline’ effect which increases or decreases incomes among all neighbourhoods in the urban area, and the ‘inequality’ effect which increases the disparities among them. The way neighbourhood change has been measured in most research on neighbourhood socioeconomic change does not enable to distinguish between these different components of change. The commonly used measures of change, which rely on the relative positions of neighbourhoods within the cit-context, exclude the effect of overall growth or decline and confound the effects of urban positional exchanges with the effect of increase in inequality. By using the standard practices it is impossible to estimate the effects of structural processes on neighbourhoods. It is also impossible to systematically compare processes of neighbourhood change across cities, while accounting for the absolute conditions in neighbourhoods. This research project introduces an application of a method to decompose total neighbourhood socioeconomic change measured in absolute terms into its contributing components. The method was originally developed for understanding income mobility of individuals. The approach enables to take account of all distributional processes that generate neighbourhood socioeconomic change, while distinguishing between them. The method promotes systematic analysis and is used to substantiate the role of inequalities in urban socio-spatial change. The project also aims at applying the method to various case studies in order to provide empirical evidence on underlying processes of neighbourhood change and their effect on urban socio-spatial structures. The applications of the proposed method demonstrates the need to move beyond relative measures of neighbourhood change due to its overcoming of two main problems of contemporary research. First, it highlights the importance of measuring change in absolute terms, which gives a more complete picture on socio-spatial dynamics. Secondly, it demonstrates how the effect of inequality can be distinguished, and how the separation of this effect is critical to drawing valid conclusions about neighbourhood change processes.
Data: CORDIS, © European Union
Project objective
Neighbourhood Change in a Comparative Context: a Social-Mobility ApproachFor decades, scholars have been seeking to understand why and how neighbourhoods change. Integrating different strands of the literature, it is suggested that neighbourhood transitions occur due to the interaction of cyclic dynamics generated by neighbourhoods’ local contexts, and structural transformations generated by higher level contexts. The interaction and the relative roles of these processes have not been investigated so far. Because research designs used to date cannot account for both types of effect, this proposal points to comparative research in contrasting regional and national contexts as a promising direction. Key methodological issues are identified in the current state-of-the-art with regard to the possibility of conducting effective comparative research on the topic: comparability of results, conceptualization of neighborhood change and distinguishing the relative impact of processes at different levels. The proposed research aims at addressing these issues in setting up a systematic approach to comparative analysis of neighbourhood change. The approach relies on the application of methods from social mobility research which has been tackling equivalent challenges. The approach will be implemented in an empirical comparative analysis of neighbourhood change in the Netherlands and Israel.
Original text from CORDIS.
Participants
- TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITEIT DELFT · DelftCoordinatorNetherlands
Links
- View on CORDIS
- DOI: 10.3030/702649
- https://www.researchgate.net/project/What-Induces-Neighbourhood-Change
Data: CORDIS, © European Union
