CogLit · Literature as a Cognitive Object; Cognitive infrastructure and human cultural transmission
Horizon 2020 — Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
- Duration
- 2018-10-18 → 2020-10-17
- EU contribution
- €183,455
- Participants
- 1
- Scheme
- MSCA-IF-EF-ST
Lines connect the coordinator with its partners.
Results in brief
Literature as a Cognitive Object; Cognitive infrastructure and human cultural transmission
Literature/ art is not a set of objects out there in the world; it is a unique and distinct human action, a distinct output of human cognition. The ‘CogLit’ project, drew on Relevance Theory (RT) to further develop the argument that literature has distinct cognitive rather than linguistic properties. It employed an innovative two-way interdisciplinary methodology building on previous research in which a psychologically realistic account of the notion of literariness is developed. The fellowship, among other things, resulted in a monograph (title ‘Literature and art as Cognitive Objects: From a Poetics of Language to a Poetics of Action’), accepted by CUP. The monograph has very wide interdisciplinary impact and makes one of the first systematic and empirically testable proposals in the 21st century on the essence of literature and art. It also provides a concrete example of how genuine interdisciplinary practices in the Arts and Humanities can directly influence theory formation in scientific and quasi-scientific domains.
Data: CORDIS, © European Union
Project objective
Interdisciplinary research between literary and art study and empirical disciplines such as linguistics and cognitive science lacks genuine reciprocity: scholars of literature and art have drawn extensively on linguistics and cognitive science, but literary and art-philosophical discourse has had little impact in these empirical domains. This project argues for genuine, two-way interdisciplinary practices in literary and art study and aims to show how research in empirical domains can not only influence but also be influenced by the investigation of literary and other art forms. The first objective of the project will focus on mental causation in order to refine my suggestion that what distinguishes works of literature and art from other objects is their cognitive aetiology: drawing on Relevance Theory, I will argue that artworks and literary texts are causally related to an art-specific type of relevance-yielding creative mental state, that I term an artistic thought state. The 2nd objective will focus on intended effects: it will take as starting point the relevance-theoretic notion of a worthwhile effect in order to introduce a new, neurologically real type of effects (positive perceptual effects) that make both artworks (e.g. literary texts) and artistic thought states relevant to individual minds. The discussion will have implications for hypotheses in various empirical domains.The IF will, among other things, result in a monograph (‘Literature as a Cognitive Object’), which will make one of the first systematic and empirically tractable proposals in the 21st century on the essence of literature and art and provide a concrete example of how genuine interdisciplinary practices in the Arts and Humanities can directly influence theory formation in scientific domains. Innovative public engagement will be a central feature of this project through a non-academic secondment at the ONCA Arts Centre and collaboration with the UK Centre for Contemporary Poetry.
Original text from CORDIS.
Participants
- UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON · BrightonCoordinatorUnited Kingdom
Links
Data: CORDIS, © European Union