H2020Individual fellowship2018–2021

BJW · When saying the world is just backfires: elites' expression of the belief in a just world, perceived immorality, moral outrage and punishment wishes

Horizon 2020 — Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions

Duration
2018-09-14 → 2021-01-31
EU contribution
€158,122
Participants
1
Scheme
MSCA-IF

Lines connect the coordinator with its partners.

Results in brief

When saying the world is just backfires: elites' expression of the belief in a just world, perceived immorality, moral outrage and punishment wishes

The unstable financial and economic situation that Europe went through during the financial crisis starting in 2008 ultimately derived from continuous malpractices by various members of the financial elite, many of whom have not been even prosecuted. Some authors say that the decisions made by the political elite to counter the effects of that crisis, such as austerity measures, worsened the situation. Others say there was no other way to address it. Regardless, the fact is that during their implementation of austerity measures, both the financial and the political elites justified them by resorting to moralizing and professorial narratives. One of these narratives was that some countries had “lived beyond their means”, which explained why they were then living difficult times and had to experience those allegedly unavoidable measures. Through this moralizing narrative, some populations, not their elites, namely southern European ones, were portrayed as lazy and irresponsible. Those measures and their negative consequences for those populations (for instance, unemployment) were thus presented as just and as a lesson. The targeted populations, however, felt these measures and the narrative(s) justifying them were unfair, and a number of outraged demonstrations against the measures, the narratives and the elites expressing them ensued. In this project, my main goals were to answer the following questions: Do narratives about justice, which are judged as moral when enacted by ordinary individuals, become judged as immoral when enacted by elite members? Do they make individuals more prone to wish various sorts of punishment targeting those elite members? What is the role of emotions in this process, namely moral outrage? Populations need elites. But elites also need the support of populations. With this research programme I aimed to show that elites'use of moralizing discourses targeting whole populations is a strategy that must be used carefully and sparingly (if at all), not only for their own good, but also to minimize reactance. Also, we must take into account that populism is on the rise. Although populists also resort to moral discourses, they target devalued minorities and elites, not whole populations, which promotes adhesion to their agendas. In sum, the use of moralizing narratives can backfire and contribute to democracy weakness.

Data: CORDIS, © European Union

Project objective

Saying that people get what they deserve and deserve what they get, can be considered as a moralizing discourse. Past research has shown that this “just world” discourse is well regarded when conveyed by ordinary citizens. The main goal of this project, however, is to show that it can backfire against those who enact it. Specifically, this programme intends to show that when financial/political elites resort to a “just world” discourse, it may lead to punishment wishes against those elites, including the use of violence. Indeed, nowadays the financial elite is stereotypically associated with white-collar crime, the consequences of which affect millions of people worldwide; and the political elite is perceived as their accomplice. It is thus hypothesized that when members of the elites, as well-intended and innocent they may be, say that people get what they deserve, they will be perceived as adding insult to injury. Compared to elite members who say that the world is unjust for people, those who say that the world is just will thus be perceived as more immoral; as a consequence, individuals will feel more moral outrage towards them and will wish them higher punishment in various domains (e.g., legal, physical, social). This is a very important issue - after the 2008 financial crisis, various European countries introduced harsh austerity measures. One strategy that political and financial elites used to legitimize these measures was to repeatedly accuse these countries, basically Southern European ones, of having lived beyond their means at the expense of the industrious Northern European. Implicit in this discourse was a collective “just world” one – those measures, as hard as they could be, were deserved. This discourse has contributed to a Northern-Southern Europe divide. This research, to be conducted by experts on justice, morality and emotions, can inform the elites about the political and personal dangers of that moralizing discourse.

Original text from CORDIS.

Participants

  • UNIVERSIDAD AUTONOMA DE MADRID · MadridCoordinatorSpain

Links

Data: CORDIS, © European Union