POPULARITAS · pursuit of consensus and populism in ancient Rome
Horizon 2020 — Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
- Duration
- 2018-09-01 → 2020-08-31
- EU contribution
- €168,277
- Participants
- 1
- Scheme
- MSCA-IF-EF-ST
Lines connect the coordinator with its partners.
Results in brief
Popularitas : pursuit of consensus and populism in ancient Rome
The Popularitas project aimed to provide a comprehensive study of the precedents of populism in ancient Rome. Among the scholars the precise definition of “populism” is still controversial, but the populist is usually understood as a politician who claims to have a direct connection with the people and exploits this alleged connection, in order to break the rules of political competition, to influence the masses, and to gain power. If this use of the term is quite recent, it is also undeniable that this political attitude is not a peculiarity of the last decades. So, a question arises: can we trace this pattern back to classical antiquity? The Latin adjective popularis had a passive meaning (the man who enjoys the favour of the people), but also an active one (the man who seeks the favour of the people). Sometimes this active meaning was employed in connection with ambitious outsiders, wannabe “charismatic” leaders, who took a perspective hostile to the senatorial elite, claimed to have a direct connection with the people, and exploited this connection in order to bypass the institutions, to subvert the constitutional rules, and to gain power. The object of the project has been precisely this political attitude, where the legitimate seeking of consensus turned into populism: what are the similarities and differences between ancient and contemporary populism? how far the allegations against ancient populists were well-founded? did populistic attitudes have ideological implications? to what extent populistic methods were effective? what was the people’s feedback? In the last few decades, scholars’ interest on the dynamics of the Roman political system has increased. Extensive research has been consecrated to the Roman political thought, to the faction and “political parties” in republican Rome, to the impact of electoral corruption, to popular participation in legislative and electoral assemblies… But a study on “populism” in ancient Rome had never been attempted before. The Popularitas project aimed to fill this gap.
Data: CORDIS, © European Union
Project objective
The Popularitas project aims to provide a comprehensive study of the precedents of populism in ancient Rome. The Latin adjective popularis had a passive meaning (the man who enjoys the favour of the people), but also an active one (the man who seeks the favour of the people). Sometimes this active meaning was employed in connection with ambitious outsiders, wannabe “charismatic” leaders, who took a perspective hostile to the senatorial elite, claimed to have a direct connection with the people, and exploited this connection in order to bypass the institutions, to subvert the constitutional rules, and to gain power. The object of the project is precisely this political attitude, where the legitimate seeking of consensus turned into populism: what are the similarities and differences between ancient and contemporary populism? how far the allegations against ancient populists were well-founded? did populistic attitudes have ideological implications? to what extent populistic methods were effective? what was the people’s feedback? The main output of the project will be the publication of a monograph on the populism in ancient Rome and of three scientific papers; a two-days international conference on “ancient and modern populisms”, open to classicists, modern historians, and political scientists; a course of lectures on the ancient populism in the secondary schools; the creation of an internet site, intended both for scientific and educational use.The Popularitas project will historicize for the first time a much-discussed political phenomenon of our time and highlight similarities (and differences) with the ancient political practice. It will provide the tools for a diachronic assessment of modern populism, opening new research prospects. Its ambition is not only to be useful to the historians of the ancient world, but also to offer to political scientists and sociologist some fresh material and a new starting point for a proper understanding of the phenomenon.
Original text from CORDIS.
Participants
- UNIVERSITA CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE · MILANOCoordinatorItaly
Links
Data: CORDIS, © European Union