H2020Individual fellowship2018–2020

INRES · Inquiring gaps, discrepancies and contradictions in response to domestic gender-based violence. Gender relationships, practical norms and public services in Senegal.

Horizon 2020 — Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions

Duration
2018-11-01 → 2020-10-31
EU contribution
€173,076
Participants
1
Scheme
MSCA-IF-EF-ST

Lines connect the coordinator with its partners.

Results in brief

Inquiring gaps, discrepancies and contradictions in response to domestic gender-based violence. Gender relationships, practical norms and public services in Senegal.

Why, on the global scale, gender mainstreaming and public policies against gender-based violence are still weak and defective? Why, despite the several awareness-raising campaigns, the reporting rates of partner and domestic violence continue to be low ? Particularly for countries which are the target of development aid, these questions are generally addressed by demographic investigation and by an applied research funded by transnational stakeholders. Yet, these studies often propose traditionalist explanations of gender-based violence, using notions of culture and gender which are not adequate to reflect the reality of local social dynamics. Moreover, these kinds of inquiry privilege survey and quantitative data and do not elaborate in-depth understanding of the implementation gaps in the everyday life of public policies. Further, these approaches do not discuss that the institutions do not have the monopoly in responding to gender-based violence. Other unformalised patterns for giving repair for gender violence exist in the local settings and survivors do operate an evaluation on which kind of help seeking. Under these presumptions, the INRES research project proposed to understand the socio-political stakes in responding gender-based violence through a grounded-based research able to account for the multiple ways through which domestic gender-based violence is tackled in the Senegalese urban life. INRES consisted in an anthropological ethnography drawn on an original articulation of theoretical questions pertaining to the anthropology of kinship, development and law, combined with the suggestions of gender studies. In spite of taking for granted the institutional and transnational explication for gender-based violence, INRES wanted to identify and analyse the multiple situated definition of this phenomenon, by understanding the multiplicity of voices on this subject and their frictions in the interpretation of the violence. Accordingly to the anthropological literature on public policies, INRES intended to ethnographically understand the conditions of access to legal assistance and welfare support in cases of gender-based violence, by considering those practical norms that are deployed in divergence from official ones. Finally, INRES was aimed at understanding how, outside the institutions and within households, kinship webs and neighbourhoods, the situations of injustice and violence against women have been discussed and mastered by the past generations, and are discussed and mastered nowadays.

Data: CORDIS, © European Union

Project objective

Preventing and responding to domestic gender-based violence is a socio-cultural and political stake. Various public policies, including development ones, address this subject but if we consider their implementations several discrepancies, gaps and contradictions emerge. Focusing on Senegal, INRES is aimed at exploring the socio-cultural dynamics on which this phenomenon is grounded by sizing: a) the different representations of gender-based violence and of injustice in men’s behaviours towards women that circulate among pertinent distinct social actors (i.e. state officers, lawyers, NGOs personnel, women and, in a broader sense, citizens); b) how legal procedures and guidelines are effectively implemented in this domain, considering the practical norms that are deployed in divergence of official ones; c) which uninstitutionalised patterns of handling domestic gender-based violence are spread in the social arenas and the meanings that legitimate them. From a theoretical point of view INRES proposes an approach that combines in a seminal fashion different research fields of anthropology (of development and public polices, of law and of gender and kinship), integrating social history and gender studies and being committed with the purposes of a public anthropology.

Original text from CORDIS.

Participants

  • CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE CNRS · ParisCoordinatorFrance

Links

Data: CORDIS, © European Union