LION · L'industrie oubliée de Néandertal - The forgotten industry of Neanderthal
Horizon 2020 — Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
- Duration
- 2019-10-01 → 2021-09-30
- EU contribution
- €166,320
- Participants
- 1
- Scheme
- MSCA-IF-EF-ST
Lines connect the coordinator with its partners.
Results in brief
L'industrie oubliée de Néandertal - The forgotten industry of Neanderthal
In Western Europe, the arrival of Anatomically Modern Human (Sapiens) and the disappearance of the last Neandertals, around 40,000 years BP, marked the Middle-Upper Palaeolithic transition. Significant changes occurred in the material cultures. Anatomically Modern Human brought with him a great diversity of production attesting new practices. Bone material became widely used for manufacturing objects such as ornaments, figurines or weapons, whose functional and social specialisation was clearly expressed through a thorough shaping, mostly done by scraping or abrasion. This has resulted in types that are today intelligible to us. In contrast, the absence of bone objects shaped in the same way in the Middle Palaeolithic led to think that Neanderthal did not produce bone industry and that this deficiency was probably due to a cognitive difference between species. For a long time, the “retouchers”, used in lithic knapping, were the only Neanderthal bone tools frequently reported. Collected among butchery remains, unshaped and discarded in situ after a short-term use, they gave a picture of a poorly mastered and opportunistic use of bone. Other types of tool were identified from time to time, but the rarity of specimens, their minimal shaping, often done by percussion as for lithic tools, and the difficulty of determining their function, reinforced the idea that Neanderthal did not understand the specificities of the bone material. The recent discovery of more than one thousand bone tools at the Neanderthal site of Chagyrskaya cave in Siberia, by means of a technological and use-wear analysis applied to faunal remains, allowed to question this assertion. The number of tools, their diversity and recurrence are characteristic of an industry and show that these Siberian Neanderthals made a daily use of bone to meet specific needs. Nevertheless, we did not know if this isolated discovery was a regional particularity or if it could be a more general phenomenon, disregarded due to the lack of an adequate conceptual and methodological frameworks. To test these hypotheses, we searched, with the same analytical grid as applied at Chagyrskaya cave, for bone tools in Neanderthal sites located in Western Europe, where the first Neanderthal bone tools were mentioned more than a century ago.
Data: CORDIS, © European Union
Project objective
The development of Paleolithic sciences from the exceptional European heritage led to define the behavioral modernity on the basis of the material culture of Homo Sapiens in this part of the world. In the set of modern traits is the use of bone materials, for making fully shaped objects by means of varied techniques. The lack of bone industry by Neanderthal has been considered as a cognitive gap. However, the definition of what a bone industry should be is based on artefacts having a strong social and symbolic value, which excludes part of the equipments made by Homo Sapiens himself. Indeed, a large part of the bone industry within the Solutrean assemblages was revealed by my PhD investigations: due to the use of percussion for blanks production and tools shaping, these products were confused with the faunal remains. The transfer of my analytical grid to Paleolithic sites of the Siberian Altai, among which Denisova cave, has uncovered a diversified bone industry in occupation layers from other Hominians. My identification of more than a thousand knapped bone tools opens up new perspectives. Was the production of this industry by Denisovans and Neanderthals a local shared tradition, or is this the sign of a wider practice so far unseen by lack of appropriate analytical and conceptual tools? I propose to investigate this issue by extending the corpus to Neanderthal sites of Western Europe and by creating a traceological framework suitable for the functional recognition of the unshaped bone tools. My aim is to contribute to the debate on the cognitive faculty of archaic Humans, not so much in binary terms, as all too often discussed, but rather according to the structure of their technical world. The Traceolab, at the University of Liege, with its modern equipment, its field of competence in full adequacy with the subject and its access to archaeological collections of great value constitutes the most favourable context for the continuation of my research.
Original text from CORDIS.
Participants
- UNIVERSITE DE LIEGE · LIEGECoordinatorBelgium
Links
- View on CORDIS
- DOI: 10.3030/839528
- https://www.recherche.uliege.be/cms/c_12809455/en/malvina-baumann-lion-project
Data: CORDIS, © European Union
