H2020Individual fellowship2019–2022

SPECIMEN · Depicting Species: The Role of the Image in Modern Biology 1750-1950

Horizon 2020 — Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions

Duration
2019-08-01 → 2022-07-31
EU contribution
€278,841
Participants
2
Scheme
MSCA-IF

Lines connect the coordinator with its partners.

Results in brief

Depicting Species: The Role of the Image in Modern Biology 1750-1950

In studying the diversity of nature, biologists have employed a remarkable range of scientific images. The use of these visual representations in science and to communicate science has a long tradition. The project SPECIMEN is the first study to investigate the transformation of pictorial scientific practices in zoological systematics and how it redefined the boundary between expert and lay audiences from a long durée perspective (1750-1950). The project explores the ways scientists, popularizers, and other actors involved in the dissemination of scientific knowledge used and redefined visual languages to address different audiences, including their fellow biologists. The use of images for sharing results, ideas, theories, experiences, and movements of thought is not restricted to scientists. Basically, everyone with access to social media, the internet, and traditional analog publication formats consumes, creates, and distributes images. Nevertheless, images are, as we know, complicated vehicles. As much as they enable shortcuts across social, cultural, and geographical communication boundaries, they also impede such communication. We do not always understand what we see based on an image alone, because we are not familiar with specific connotations and the contexts images refer to visually; at the same time we cannot be sure that the images we share are not being misinterpreted and misused by others. Focusing on the example of scientific images produced for classifying animals, this project explores how images change their meanings as they travel across different audiences. In my research, I follow specific image-pathways, considering how these images were used and reused in relation to two interrelated objectives. In the framework of Objective 1, I explore the ways academically trained biologists used visual representations in their particular research programs, with the aim of investigating how changes in visual conventions and modes of zoological illustrations were tied to changes in scientific approaches to systematics. Objective 2 explores these scientific images’ distribution and dissemination across expert and lay audiences. How have norms for using these images changed across audiences? How have changing contexts for the dissemination and reproduction of scientific images changed their meanings and readings?

Data: CORDIS, © European Union

Project objective

This project investigates the visual cultures of zoological systematics informed by practices, techniques, genres, ideas, materiality, norms, producers, and audiences. Approaching systematics through its rich pictorial legacy, I explore how thinking through images in using them as research tools produces distinct species concepts and how images used as training or teaching devices informed species concepts. The timeframe of this investigation spans three centuries and explores two hundred years of biological research between Linnaeus’ first attempt to standardize zoological nomenclature in 1758 and the “Modern Synthesis” of evolution and heredity in the 1930s and 1940s. On the basis of the empirical examination of archival collections and printed materials, I examine the functions, production, and usage of zoological illustrations within biological research (objective 1) and follow their circulation among lay audiences (objective 2). I will approach the material from an interdisciplinary perspective. This involves first an iconographic method as a foundation for a comparative evaluation. I draw here on both scientific and artistic practices. Second, I embed the production of zoological illustrations within the framework of cooperative knowledge production between different groups of actors stemming from different intellectual, educational, social, and national backgrounds. This will be the first study of the transformation of pictorial scientific practices in systematics between 1750 and 1950 and how they redefined the boundary between expert and lay audiences. The book resulting from this research will draw a vivid panorama of scientific knowledge production carried out by zoologist, artists, technicians, and amateur scientist.

Original text from CORDIS.

Participants

  • UNIVERSITE DE GENEVE · GeneveCoordinatorSwitzerland
  • THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM · MADISON WIUnited States

Links

Data: CORDIS, © European Union