H2020Individual fellowship2021–2024

CODE_FLUX · Cultural Codes in Crisis: Unsettled Civil Spheres in Brexit, the 2016 US Presidential Election, and the 2017 German Federal Election

Horizon 2020 — Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions

Duration
2021-04-01 → 2024-03-31
EU contribution
€251,003
Participants
2
Scheme
MSCA-IF

Lines connect the coordinator with its partners.

Results in brief

Cultural Codes in Crisis: Unsettled Civil Spheres in Brexit, the 2016 US Presidential Election, and the 2017 German Federal Election

The Action, “Cultural Codes in Crisis: Unsettled Civil Spheres in Brexit, the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election, and the 2017 German Federal Election,” or Code_Flux, investigates the processes by which politics and public sentiments lurched rightward in many European and American countries during the second decade of the twenty-first century. Far-right political candidates and social movements gained support from wider swaths of nations’ publics, who themselves evidenced newfound appetites for anti-establishment and normatively transgressive messaging or “discourse.” Organizations, trade relations, and security pacts designed to cultivate international cooperation and integration came under increasing attack. Public discourse grew replete with themes of redoubling physical and legal barriers to nations’ borders, and expressions of support for multicultural commitments to diversity and inclusion receded or, when expressed, were increasingly met with opposition tinged with conspiratorial accusations of demographic replacement and cultural erasure. Developed in this context, the Code_Flux Action was designed with the objective of investigating such swells of rightwing populism, ethnonational, and isolationism in western democracies, ones which had ostensibly “progressed” beyond such reactionary impulses. Investigating and understanding these dynamics is important because past iterations of such developments have been marked by democratic backsliding manifest in attacks on, for instance, legal protections for a free press, the autonomy of the judiciary, and the integrity of democratic elections. Such processes have also contributed to the marginalization of minority and out-groups, and entrenched power and resource imbalances rooted in unjust, anti-pluralistic criteria such as primordial or ethnic-identity traits. In their most radical manifestations, they have precipitated armed conflicts between nations, and facilitated the oppression, if not the systematic elimination, of minority publics within nations formally committed to democratic rules and norms. The research performed in Code_Flux’s Work Packages contributes to identifying such processes and preventing such backsliding. The objectives of Code_Flux have been twofold. 1. Empirically, the Action has aimed to gain a better understanding of how such conditions develop, and to diagnosis if, and the extent to which, contemporary European and North American publics have abandoned their commitments to democratic institutions and inclusive, pluralistic civil societies. 2. Theoretically: the Action draws on Civil Sphere Theory (CST), societalization theory, and the concept of Binary Cultural Codes (BCCs), to specify foundational discursive elements – or especially powerful words and symbols -- that control, anchor, and organize the political and civil sentiments of publics within these western democratic social orders. To investigate the BCCs in this historical moment, the Action examined political and civil discourses in three contexts: the 2016 U.S. presidential campaigns; the Brexit referendum’s Leave and Remain campaigns; and the rise of the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) in 2015 and the backlash protests it precipitated during the first quarter of 2024.

Data: CORDIS, © European Union

Project objective

Populism, ethno-nationalism, and isolationism have rippled through recent elections in Western democracies, unsettling the multicultural, globalist, and neoliberal trajectories many had assumed were durable and determined. Brexit in the UK, Donald Trump’s victory in the USA, and the strong showing of the Alternative for Deutschland (AfD) in Germany’s 2017 federal election upended the conventional wisdom and drew deep cultural and social cleavages to the fore. This study approaches these developments as manifestations of severe challenges to foundational cultural elements that control, anchor, and organize liberal, Western democratic social orders. By investigating these dueling political campaigns and press coverage that narrated these three democratic votes, this project examines the scope and intensity of these challenges. The study focuses on meaning structures, or cultural codes and justification narratives, that these events’ principal actors performed in effort to move citizens to vote, and specifies the interpretive resources citizens drew upon to justify their voting actions. In effort to innovate methodologically, the study uses two frameworks to investigate each of these sites, one qualitative, called structural hermeneutics, and one a quantitative, digital technique called computational hermeneutics. Through its investigation of Brexit, the rise of Trumpism and the 2016 US presidential election, and the rise and institutionalization of the AfD in Germany, this study addresses issue of the foundational elements of culture, and explains how these structures came to be agitated into a state of flux.

Original text from CORDIS.

Participants

  • UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI TRENTO · TrentoCoordinatorItaly
  • YALE UNIVERSITY · New HavenUnited States

Links

Data: CORDIS, © European Union