FullCompensation · Rationalising Full Compensation of Non-Pecuniary Damages to Reconcile Equal Treatment and Personalisation
Horizon 2020 — Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
- Duration
- 2022-04-01 → 2023-09-30
- EU contribution
- €131,679
- Participants
- 1
- Scheme
- MSCA-IF
Lines connect the coordinator with its partners.
Results in brief
Rationalising Full Compensation of Non-Pecuniary Damages to Reconcile Equal Treatment and Personalisation
The FullCompensation project aimed to address the issue of variable and unpredictable non-pecuniary damage awards in the EU under civil liability law. Victims of accidents are entitled to compensation for both economic and non-economic losses, such as medical expenses and pain and suffering, respectively. While it's relatively straightforward to compensate economic losses (pecuniary damages), non-pecuniary damages are more problematic because they lack a market price, leading to subjectivity and biases. To address this, adjudicators in some EU Member States are using guidelines to help judges award non-pecuniary damages more objectively and consistently. However, concerns remain about the variability and unpredictability of such awards within countries, leading to two critical societal issues. First, it can result in unjustified differences in damage awards for similar losses. Second, it can lead to economic inefficiency, making out-of-court settlements more difficult and increasing the costs of compensation for both individuals and society. In response to this, FullCompensation aimed to develop a legislative proposal and guidelines for EU Member States and adjudicators to quantify non-pecuniary damages in a way that balances equal treatment and personalization. These documents are meant to inspire, not impose uniformity, and seek to promote fairness in damage awards and reduce the costs of compensation based on literature insights and empirical evidence.
Data: CORDIS, © European Union
Project objective
In the EU, full compensation of non-pecuniary damages remains fragmented and subjective, leading to unequal outcomes within jurisdictions. This is despite numerous attempts to reduce variability, e.g. barèmes and tables. The project aims to develop evidence-based guidelines for decision-makers to award damages, reconciling equal treatment and personalisation. Such guidelines will be developed into a model legislative proposal for Member States to foster rationalisation in this sector. The goal is to reduce bias, uncertainty, subjectivity and unequal treatment in the assessment of non-pecuniary damages, minimising the social and individual costs of awarding such damages, while at the same time investigating the actual perception of full compensation by victims. To this end, the project will (1) explore damages awarding mechanisms in the EU and the legal aids to assess compensation; (2) investigate, through online and laboratory behavioural experiments, the actual perception of fair and full compensation by adjudicators, identifying their mechanisms of psychic satisfaction and their cognitive reaction to different legal aids; (3) based on the collected experimental results, develop tools to assess compensation and assist decision-making processes.
Original text from CORDIS.
Participants
- UNIVERSITEIT MAASTRICHT · MaastrichtCoordinatorNetherlands
Links
- View on CORDIS
- DOI: 10.3030/101028723
- https://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/blog/author/andrea-parziale-20627
Data: CORDIS, © European Union
