HEIndividual fellowship2022–2024

EcoDisc · Investigating the moral ideals and social norms of economic discrimination

Horizon Europe — Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions

Duration
2022-11-01 → 2024-10-31
EU contribution
€214,934
Participants
2
Scheme
HORIZON-TMA-MSCA-PF-EF

Lines connect the coordinator with its partners.

Results in brief

Investigating the moral ideals and social norms of economic discrimination

What do discrimination preferences look like, and what drives individuals to discriminate or refuse to discriminate? This project examines a richer set of discrimination preferences than what exists in the economics literature to improve our understanding of discrimination. The project examines the classical discrimination preferences in the literature of (i) a desire to favor (or harm) a group (often called a taste), and (ii) a desire to maximize one's expected financial earnings through statistical discrimination based on beliefs about group characteristics. It also adapts ideas from an extensive parallel literature showing that moral principles impact economic decisions involving implementing equality and retributing productivity—both standard features of discrimination decisions. That is, in addition to classical preferences, this project studies new preferences against discrimination, which it introduces from a moral principle that protected groups should be treated equally, and a new preference for statistical discrimination, which it takes from a principle that a more productive-on-average group should be retributed. The project first develops a portable methodology to evaluate preferences for and against discrimination (and underlying moral principles) using incentivized experiments. Then, it deploys this methodology to evaluate such preferences among a representative sample of a country along three dimensions central to anti-discrimination laws—ethnicity, gender, and LGBTQ+ status. The project will inform academics and policymakers regarding the extent and drivers of discrimination, and it will serve as the basis for further studies of discrimination.

Data: CORDIS, © European Union

Project objective

Do individuals consider economic discrimination rooted in statistical differences to be any fairer or more permissible than that rooted in dislike? Economists recognize two canonical types of discrimination: that based on distaste of some groups, taken as morally objectionable, and that based on statistical differences between groups, sometimes conjectured to be much more acceptable. Surprisingly, the literature stays silent on the types of discrimination that individuals actually hold to be morally correct (moral ideals) and says little about what they collectively recognize to be morally correct (social norms). A clear answer is important because ideals and norms have been shown to influence economic behavior and because it is a prerequisite for welfare analyses, policymaking, and proper societal debate. The possible application domains range from governmental policies on discriminatory practices in labor and residential markets to police search strategies and workplace training. EcoDisc will first develop a novel method using incentivized experiments to evaluate discriminatory behavior and underlying ideals and norms, for different types of ethnic and gender discrimination. Then, it will empirically estimate the distribution of such discrimination behavior, ideals, and norms using a countrywide representative sample of Denmark. The research is to be conducted at Aarhus University under the guidance of Professor Daniele Nosenzo, with a secondment at NHH Norwegian School of Economics FAIR under the guidance of FAIR director, Professor Bertil Tungodden.

Original text from CORDIS.

Participants

  • AARHUS UNIVERSITET · Aarhus CCoordinatorDenmark
  • NORGES HANDELSHOYSKOLE · BergenNorway

Links

Data: CORDIS, © European Union