CMCSU · Climate Models and Climate Scientific Understanding
Horizon Europe — Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
- Duration
- 2022-11-01 → 2024-10-31
- EU contribution
- €189,687
- Participants
- 1
- Scheme
- HORIZON-TMA-MSCA-PF-EF
Lines connect the coordinator with its partners.
Results in brief
Climate Models and Climate Scientific Understanding
Climate change is one of the defining problems of our time. As stated in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) of Working Group 1 (WG1), “It is unequivocal that human influence has warmed the atmosphere, ocean, and land,” and these anthropogenic-induced changes are “already affecting many weather and climate extremes in every region across the globe.” Successfully addressing this problem necessitates an unprecedented level of scientific, public, and policy engagement and collaboration. There are reasons to believe that the success of the efforts to deal with the climate change problem hinges on a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon of climate change by all involved. As it is emphasized, for instance, in the IPCC’s AR6 “Responses to climate change are facilitated when leaders, policymakers, resource managers, and their constituencies share a basic understanding of the causes, effects, and possible future course of climate change.” Therefore, a crucial question for everyone interested in this topic is: what does it take for all parties with a vested interest or role in the climate change dialogue to achieve an understanding of climate change? Particularly, why is it important for scientists to understand, rather than merely know, how Earth’s climate system works? This last question was the main problem that the CMCSU project was concerned with. The aim of the project was to develop an account of climate scientific understanding, i.e. of the way in which understanding of Earth’s climate system is pursued and achieved in climate science. The project was structured around three main objectives: - Objective 1 focuses on arguing that there is more to understanding in climate science than what is provided by highly idealized and simplified conceptual climate models. - Objective 2 involves analysing climate models to determine their explanatory power and whether they can contribute to understanding the climate system in non-explanatory ways. - Objective 3 aims to develop a comprehensive account of climate scientific understanding and the means by which it can be achieved, thereby enhancing the practice of climate science.
Data: CORDIS, © European Union
Project objective
What exactly is the epistemic goal of constructing climate models? Can these models help us in our endeavour to understand Earth’s climate system and our role in climate change? This is a very important question that hasn’t yet received the attention it deserves in the recent philosophy of climate science. My overall research objective in this project is to address this important lacuna. I plan to do this by developing an account of climate scientific understanding and the means by which we can achieve understanding in climate science. The method I will use originates with Carnap and has recently gained a great deal of popularity, i.e. conceptual engineering. I will achieve this objective by combining my previous expertise on the topic of understanding with scientific models and the role of mathematics in scientific understanding with the new skills and competencies gained through advanced training, under the guidance of a highly qualified supervisor, Prof. Stephan Hartmann, a leading expert on scientific models and their role in science. Conducting this project at the Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (LMU) will considerably improve my research and help me make significant contributions to the current discussion in the philosophy of climate science. This will establish me as an independent research leader in Europe and, therefore, help me secure a permanent academic position. The results of this project can have a wide-ranging impact on the philosophy of science and neighbouring philosophical and scientific disciplines. For instance, it can contribute to a better understanding of the practice of climate science, it can generate a new context for forging interdisciplinary relations between philosophers and climate scientists, and (suitably modified) it can be used in a general strategy to help the general public better understand and trust climate science.My project fits with the 13th goal set out in the UN 2030 Agenda on Sustainable Development
Original text from CORDIS.
Participants
- LUDWIG-MAXIMILIANS-UNIVERSITAET MUENCHEN · PlaneggCoordinatorGermany
Links
- View on CORDIS
- DOI: 10.3030/101067782
- https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e50f8434d2&appId=PPGMS
- https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e512771b97&appId=PPGMS
Data: CORDIS, © European Union
