4CB · Cognitive Common Currency or Contextual Bargaining ? A new model for food preferences
FP7 — People (Marie Curie Actions)
- Duration
- 2011-06-01 → 2013-05-31
- EU contribution
- €192,350
- Participants
- 1
- Scheme
- MC-IEF
Lines connect the coordinator with its partners.
Results in brief
Cognitive Common Currency or Contextual Bargaining ? A new model for food preferences
Perceivers and consumers behaviour presents an important variety. One of the most challenging and salient case of variety is presented by consumers' behaviour. As summarised by Köster (2009), the recurrent question in the domain of food studies is: ‘‘Why does who eat what, when and where?’’ Answering this question implies taking into account the context surrounding a situation of food consumption. But what is the context? A basic dictionary defines it as the set of circumstances or facts that surround a particular event or situation. Although most authors would agree with this general definition, different questions remain: which variables should be included as contextual (external vs. internal to the consumers)? How do the variables interact (additive vs. integrative way)? And how can contextual influences be studied, noticeably using controlled laboratory protocols? The present project investigated these questions through a novel approach combining cognitive neuroscience, experimental psychology and fundamental conceptual approaches. Its main results have been to challenge the clear divide between low-level perceptual or emotional influences (i.e.heat and thirst increases drinking behaviour) and high level cognitive influences (e.g. cultural background and expectations regarding specific products) by studying the role of feelings of congruence between a product and its environment. These feelings of congruence are based on internalised statistical regularities, and not necessarily explicit or rational. Besides the theoretical investigation of the category of crossmodal congruence (or correspondence), the present project also evidenced a series of such correspondences (between sounds and odours ; shapes and tastes ; shapes and flavours - for instance, bitter tastes are considered congruent with angular and not rounded shapes) and bridged gaps with the investigation of the behavioral, cognitive and emotional effects of these correspondences in other modalities. These results have an important potential in terms of guiding behaviour ('nudging') and contacts were made with several companies interested in their exploitation.
Data: CORDIS, © European Union
Project objective
Research has for long focused on what people choose, not how they choose. In the domain of food choices, like elsewhere, the dominant model is that preferences are comparative judgments between quantities of sensory pleasure. Significant development lately in the cognitive neurosciences on the many roles of hedonic systems in choices and behavior have put pressures on this classical ‘common currency’ (Cabanac,1992) model of decisions. They stress the variety of low-level, automatic, sub-personal influences bearing on food choices, and show that behaviour can be ‘nudged’ in context (Thaler & Susstein, 2008). This still doesn’t address the nature and the role played by food preferences at the conscious, personal level.The objective is to provide such a model. The timely interdisciplinary methodology draws on cognitive sciences and philosophical models of the mind, advancing bridging the gap between the study of evaluative and perceptual processes. Guided by recent models in multi-modal flavour perception (Auvray &Spence, 2007), 4CB defends a model of contextual bargaining for food choices. It combines conceptual and experimental approaches, and is set up in the interdisciplinary Center for the Study of the Senses. It defends and puts to test two key proposals by distinguishing different kinds of preferences (contextual/automatic/reflective) and contextual influences on them (multisensory context and cognitive context of consumption). Consequences for the wider concept of ‘preferences’ and impact on heath and food policies are integral to the project.""
Original text from CORDIS.
Participants
- UNIVERSITY OF LONDON · LondonCoordinatorUnited Kingdom
Links
Data: CORDIS, © European Union
