RIEBHE · Race, identity, exclusion and belonging in higher education: Personal narratives and classroom discourse""
7РП — „Хора“ (Действия „Мария Кюри“)
- Период
- 2013-02-01 → 2017-06-04
- Финансиране от ЕС
- 87 500 €
- Участници
- 1
- Схема
- MC-CIG
Линиите свързват координатора с партньорите.
Накратко на български
Расовите идентичности в норвежките университети се анализират чрез разговори в класните стаи и лични истории, като например как националността се свързва с цвета на кожата. Това помага да се разбере как се създават усещания за изключване или принадлежност сред студентите и персонала.
Кратко обяснение, генерирано от езиков модел по текста на CORDIS. Оригиналът е по-долу.
Резултати накратко
Race, identity, exclusion and belonging in higher education: Personal narratives and classroom discourse
The project seeks to understand how ‘race’ and ‘racialization’ are constituted in classroom talk (discourse) and personal stories (narratives) in the Norwegian university. This involves understanding how membership categories related to race – including ethnicity, nationality, and religion – are produced and taken up in lectures and seminars. Furthermore, we explore the implications of race and racialization discourse on experiences of inclusion, exclusion, identity and belonging through the personal narratives of members of the academic community: students, administrative staff, and academic staff. The study will generate a ‘conversation’ between the university classroom race and racialization discourse and the personal narratives of racialized academic community members, in order to explore the workings of ideology, agency and resistance. Since February 2013, we have collected and analyzed classroom discourse data from four undergraduate-level university courses at two universities in Norway. Forty percent of classroom time for each course has been audio recorded and transcribed. The researcher’s analysis demonstrates that in classroom interactions, nationality, religion and culture are used as a cover to discuss “race.” In addition, whiteness is centered as a taken-for-granted norm against which “Others” are discussed as special cases. We see that nationality is racialized such that Norwegianness is made equivalent to whiteness, non-whiteness is equated with non-Norwegianness, and these categories are connected to biological concepts of race. For the study exploring personal narratives, we interviewed 15 students, administrative staff and academic staff across the same two universities. All of the interview participants are racialized people in the Norwegian context; that is, they would not be considered white ‘ethnic Norwegians’ by white Norwegians. In the interviews, participants relate moments in their lives, particularly at the university, where they felt “different” because of their skin color, facial features, or ethnicity. Thematic analysis of the interviews show that participants easily remember microaggressions, where their belongingness in Norwegian space is contested. Even those who are Norwegian or have lived in Norway all their lives report being stereotyped based on their perceived national origin and having their Norwegian language abilities questioned. Some staff experience subtle exclusion at their university workplace. Interviewees describe the need to prove themselves and be better than white Norwegian colleagues and classmates to be perceived as competent. We plan to turn to a narrative methodological approach to understand how these stories of inclusion and (mostly) exclusion are structured. This project addresses a gap in the literature by investigating discourse about race and racialization in (1) Norway as a late-comer to ‘multiculturalism’ in Europe, and (2) in higher education, where young adults develop further the democratic capacities that they will carry with them into their future actions as citizens and workers. With the current migrant ‘crisis’ in Europe occurring concomitantly with a rise in right-wing political parties and anti-immigrant public sentiment in many European countries, this project is timely. It contributes to an understanding of how the racialized ‘Other’ is constructed through discourse within a societal institution that is tasked with being a beacon of knowledge and enlightened civil discourse: the university.
Текст от CORDIS, на английски · Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз
Цел на проекта
This project informs our understanding of how issues related to race and racialization are constructed through the use of language in higher education settings in Europe, using Norway as a case example. Study 1 compares race and racialization in classroom talk (discourse) in 2-4 university courses, both traditional lectures and dialogue-based courses. Study 2 explores personal stories (narratives) of university students, professors and staff from racial minority groups, creating new spaces for often-silenced voices. In a methodologically innovative move, the two studies are placed in ‘conversation,’ to understand how race and racialization discourse and personal narratives can ‘talk’ to each other to reveal the workings of ideology, agency and resistance. Based on previous research, the researcher anticipates race and racialization discourse to be hidden under more explicit talk about immigration, religion and nation. Higher education serves as a ‘laboratory’ for examining these issues. Although race and racialization discourse has been studied in schools and educational policy, there is a gap in higher education research in this area. Universities are important because the ideas developed and propagated in higher education influence the broader social context: university students are democratic participants who go on to take positions of power and academics shape public discourse. Finally, Norway is a strong case example for at least two reasons. First, Norway is one of the last countries in Europe to transition to a ‘multicultural’ state. Second, Norway’s wealth has largely protected the country from the economic hardship that has affected much of Europe, so it provides an opportunity to understand how race and racialization discourse is constructed in relatively low-stress circumstances. The Norwegian case can be used as a comparison to explore how issues of race and racialization are constructed in Europe and relate to minority residents’ personal narratives.""
Оригинален текст от CORDIS (на английски).
Участници
- UNIVERSITETET I BERGEN · BergenКоординаторНорвегия
Връзки
Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз
