H2020Индивидуална стипендия2017–2019

TECHSUS · Technology for Sustainability in Organisations: Case Studies on Agricultural Production

„Хоризонт 2020“ — Действия „Мария Склодовска-Кюри“

Период
2017-05-01 → 2019-04-30
Финансиране от ЕС
195 455 €
Участници
1
Схема
MSCA-IF-EF-RI

Линиите свързват координатора с партньорите.

Накратко на български

Технологиите в земеделието се анализират, за да се разбере дали повечето техника винаги води до устойчиво производство на храна. Това е важно, защото настоящите модели често насърчават интензивното земеделие пред по-щадящите за природата методи.

Този кратък обзор е генериран от изкуствен интелект

Кратко обяснение, генерирано от езиков модел по текста на CORDIS. Оригиналът е по-долу.

Резултати накратко

Technology for Sustainability in Organisations: Case Studies on Agricultural Production

In the contemporary world, technological solutions to the ecological challenges have received a central role. Due to the robust political commitment to technological progress in environmental policy and related path dependencies, modern societies and organizations are increasingly contingent on technological systematizations. The development and adoption of increasingly advanced technological products and processes are taken for granted, and policies persist largely unquestioned. In the context of agriculture, the development and implementation of new technology is considered to be central in the future of food production and particularly critical in support of sustainable modes of agricultural production. This builds on a problematic assumption that increasing technology use and advancement are a desired phenomenon, creating positive changes. Such techno-optimism is grounded on a variety of emotional and rational aspects depending on the context at issue. The key ones, which perhaps have the most significant implications to sustainability theory and practice, are the beliefs in progress and the empirically ungrounded claims of decoupling environmental damage from economic growth. As many governmental incentives and management models still encourage inertia rather than transitions towards sustainable agricultural production, the project has great importance for society. Despite several ecological benefits of small-scale and less intensive farming methods (i.e. low degree of technology) and the rising consumer demand on sustainable produce, market shares of non-conventionally produced food remain small. Also, the matter-energy throughput of societies continues to increase. The often-higher, short-term productivity of large-scale and intensive agriculture (i.e. high degree of technology), as an outcome of greater use of external input factors, such as chemical fertilizers and pesticides, is too attractive to farmers struggling with profitability. The purpose of the project was to shed light on the question concerning the role of technology in organizing for ecological sustainability. By examining this link between technology and sustainability, the project aimed at outlining an interdisciplinary understanding on the potential and limitations of technology-driven change. The project asked: how ecological is the kind of change that technologies are able to produce? In other words, how much can we expect from technology in the quest of ecological sustainability?

Текст от CORDIS, на английски · Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз

Цел на проекта

In the contemporary world, technological solutions to the ecological challenges have received a central role. Due to the robust political commitment to technological progress in environmental policy and related path dependencies, modern societies and organisations are increasingly contingent on technological systematizations. The development and adoption of increasingly advanced technological products and processes are taken for granted, and policies persist largely unquestioned. For instance, in the context of agriculture, the development and implementation of new technology is considered to be central in the future of food production and particularly critical in support of sustainable modes of agricultural production.Current governmental incentives and management models are to encourage inertia rather than transitions towards sustainable agricultural production. Despite several ecological benefits of less intensive farming methods and the rising consumer demand on sustainable produce, market shares of non-conventionally produced food remain small. The often-higher, short-term productivity of intensive agriculture, as an outcome of greater use of external input factors, such as chemical fertilizers and pesticides, is too attractive to farmers struggling with profitability.This study hypothesises that in addition to the lack of organisational resources of the farmers (including economic capital, knowledge, and awareness of the ecological challenges) and public policies, a more fundamental barrier to developing sustainable modes of production might prevail, namely technological optimism. With high expectations on future solutions by means of clean technology, agricultural intensification efforts today may continue without interreptions. This study asks: how ecological is the kind of change that technologies are able to deliver?

Оригинален текст от CORDIS (на английски).

Участници

Връзки

Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз