H2020Индивидуална стипендия2016–2018

collActionStatus · We are the 1%, we stand with the 99%: reactions of high-status groups faced with social change attempts from low-status groups

„Хоризонт 2020“ — Действия „Мария Склодовска-Кюри“

Период: 2016-10-10 → 2018-10-09
Финансиране от ЕС: 165 599 €
Участници: 1
Схема: MSCA-IF-EF-ST

Линиите свързват координатора с партньорите.

Накратко на български

Реакциите на привилегираните групи към протестите на по-слабите, като например движението #MeToo, са в центъра на анализа. Това помага да се разберат механизмите на социалните промени към по-равнопоставено общество.

Този кратък обзор е генериран от изкуствен интелект

Кратко обяснение, генерирано от езиков модел по текста на CORDIS. Оригиналът е по-долу.

Резултати накратко

We are the 1%, we stand with the 99%: reactions of high-status groups faced with social change attempts from low-status groups

"This project addresses support for collective protest by disadvantaged groups among advantaged groups. This question is of the upmost importance to understand dynamics of social change towards more equal societies. Collective protest represents specific challenges to the privileged by making strategies commonly employed to justify inequality difficult to use. For example, before the #MeToo movement it was more acceptable to state that “gender differences are a thing of the past”. We propose a multi-level approach for the analysis of support for protest by the advantaged, including the ideological framework and the larger socio-structural context of protest (i.e., level of ad hoc security of advantage), the legitimacy of the type of protest itself and the level of group commitment of advantaged group members (i.e., level of identification with the advantaged ingroup). Reactions of advantaged groups are extremely complex. Indeed, advantaged groups reactions are determined by motivations often pointing in opposite directions. For example, whereas the motivation to protect status and resources leads the advantaged to deny support for collective protest (in order to prevent it from gaining momentum), the motivation to “do the right thing” triggers increases in support. "

Текст от CORDIS, на английски · Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз

Цел на проекта

One of the most widespread social phenomena that we witness nowadays is the emergence of collective action movements in which low-status groups mobilize in order to trigger social change (e.g. Arab Spring, Indignados, the Occupy Movement). Interest in collective action has mushroomed in the last decade, as confirmed by the fact that from the 1602 hits found in Psycarticles using the “collective action” term, more than 70% of them date from 2000 or later. However, this research is almost exclusively focused on low-status groups without taking into account high-status groups’ reactions. Existing literature on high-status groups either puts the emphasis on individual psychological processes linked to prejudice reduction or on the reinforcement of status quo. Yet, the likelihood of social change and, ultimately, the unfolding of intergroup conflict cannot be understood without considering both low-status groups’ actions and high-status groups’ reactions. This project directly targets high-status groups’ role in social change. We analyze high-status groups’ support for normative (i.e., socially accepted protest such as demonstrations) vs. nonnormative collective action behaviors (i.e., radical protest such as the use of violence).This research project main goals are to examine: 1) psychological mechanisms explaining high-status groups’ support for normative and nonnormative collective action; 2) disentangle two theoretically contrasting perspectives by analyzing moderating conditions at different levels that lead to higher support from high-status groups in response to normative and nonnormative collective action. The main idea developed is that normative and nonnormative collective action will prove effective in eliciting high-status group support in different situations. In general, this will depend on a matching between the type of action and the individual (Question 1), the type of low-status demand (Question 2) and the socio-structural context (Question 3).

Оригинален текст от CORDIS (на английски).

Участници

RIJKSUNIVERSITEIT GRONINGEN · GroningenКоординаторНидерландия