Media andConspiracy · Lost in an Ocean of Information? Media in the Everyday Life of Conspiracy Theorists
„Хоризонт 2020“ — Действия „Мария Склодовска-Кюри“
- Период
- 2019-09-01 → 2021-08-31
- Финансиране от ЕС
- 160 800 €
- Участници
- 1
- Схема
- MSCA-IF-EF-ST
Линиите свързват координатора с партньорите.
Накратко на български
Медиите в ежедневието на последователите на конспиративни теории се анализират чрез дневници и интервюта за използване на сайтове, блогове и социални мрежи. Резултатите помагат за разбирането на недоверието към официалното знание в западноевропейските общества.
Кратко обяснение, генерирано от езиков модел по текста на CORDIS. Оригиналът е по-долу.
Резултати накратко
Lost in an Ocean of Information? Media in the Everyday Life of Conspiracy Theorists
The question of truth receives much societal attention today: fake news, alternative facts and conspiracy theories seem everywhere. These discussions have only gained urgency during the corona pandemic. The contemporary media landscape plays an important role in the rise and spread of these alternative forms of knowledge, but how is largely unknown. Wishing to delve deeper than current media hypes and moral panics allow for, I have ethnographically studied the role of media in the everyday life of conspiracy theorists (CT) from a cultural sociological perspective. To study what media sources (TVchannels, newspapers, internet sites, blogs, Facebook pages/groups, etc) CTs use and why, I asked them to keep a “media diary” for two weeks and reflect on that in a follow-up interview. To study how CT’s read (interpret, appropriate and authenticate) media contents, I conducted photo/video elicitation interviews. This illuminates the way people engage with media (technologies) in an era of information overload. Such insights are valuable not just for scholars interested in the topic itself, but speak more broadly to professionals in the field (e.g. journalists, policy makers, government officials, scientists, NGO’s and politicians) who have to deal with the broader distrust of official knowledge in Western European societies. Due to the corona pandemic, no ethnographic accounts where I would be studying the online behaviour of CTs at their own homes were possible. Instead, I had to organize online meetings, most notably in the form of skype interviews in which I asked more about their media behaviour. I could and have made use of the research method of media diaries to probe their online media consumption, most of my respondents filled this in. The first main finding is that most CTs use a wide variety of news sources: from small independent news outlets, to conspiratorial blogs and newly emerging YouTube channels, but also the more mainstream public news outlets. However, the alternative media outlets that sprung up in the last years are mostly followed to get information that does not appear in the mainstream. Reasons for following these alternative channels is not merely (or at all) that mainstream media is distrusted, but more that these channels provide alternative and complementary perspectives on mainstream news. As such, respondents argue, they add to a fuller perspective of what is going on in the world. The second main finding is that CTs actually do consult the “mainstream media” they often so much despise. More than not, these people are aware of most societal discussions, and stay up-to-date by following mainstream, and mostly public service media. However, differently from most audiences who interpret the mainstream media for its substantive contents, CTs consult mainstream media for different reasons. The most prominent reason was to remain up-to-date about how topics of concern are portrayed in the mass-media and how “the majority of society” thinks about contemporary issues. Thirdly, the corona pandemic forced me to shift focus from the concrete media consumption behavior that I could observe at home, to their experiences and understandings of the role of the media during this public health crisis. Based on interviews with 23 CTs during the pandemic, I explain how they have come to distrust the official narrative as present in most media, government and science communication. Respondents argue that their suspicion began because most governments acted in unique accordance with each other, because only one way out of the crisis was presented by public health authorities and science advisory committees, and because most media did not present a variety of perspectives on how to deal with the crisis, but uniformly initiated a media panic highlighting the dangers of the virus/pandemic, and legitimizing government policies. Because media, science and politics were so much aligned in their framing of the problem and in the formulation of solutions, suspicions arose whether this did not indicate a (global) conspiracy.
Текст от CORDIS, на английски · Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз
Цел на проекта
The question of truth receives much societal attention today as fake news, alternative facts and conspiracy theories seem everywhere. People speak in alarmed terms about filter bubbles, echo chambers, the distrust of official knowledge and the dawn of a post-truth era. The contemporary media landscape plays an important role in the rise and spread of these alternative forms of knowledge, but how is largely unknown. Wishing to delve deeper than current media hypes and moral panics allow for, I propose to ethnographically study the role of media in the everyday life of conspiracy theorists (CT) from a cultural sociological perspective by means of the following three research projects. 1) To study what media sources (TV-channels, newspapers, internet sites, blogs, Facebook pages/groups, etc) do CTs use to inform themselves about the world and why, I will ask them to keep a “media diary” for two weeks and reflect on that in a follow-up interview. 2) To study how CTs use media technologies in a world where search engines and social media algorithms filter the information people receive, I will ask them in an interview setting to perform several search queries online to show me they use or circumvent such filtering technologies. 3) to study how do CT’s read (interpret, appropriate and authenticate) media contents (texts and videos), I will conduct a photo/video elicitation interview to actively study how they do so and ask them to reflect on their practice. These three objectives together should illuminate the way people engage with media (technologies) in an era of information overload. Such insights are valuable not just for scholars interested in the topic itself, but speak more broadly to professionals in the field (e.g. journalists, policy makers, government officials, scientists, NGO’s and politicians) who have to deal with the broader distrust of official knowledge in Western European societies, especially as enacted by the internet.
Оригинален текст от CORDIS (на английски).
Участници
- KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN · LeuvenКоординаторБелгия
Връзки
Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз
