BriCoFra · New ideas for the Variational Approach to Brittle and Cohesive Fracture
„Хоризонт 2020“ — Действия „Мария Склодовска-Кюри“
- Период
- 2018-10-01 → 2020-09-30
- Финансиране от ЕС
- 173 076 €
- Участници
- 1
- Схема
- MSCA-IF-EF-ST
Линиите свързват координатора с партньорите.
Накратко на български
Математическите модели на пукнатините изследват разликата между внезапното счупване на твърди материали и бавното разкъсване, при което частиците остават свързани. Това помага за по-точното изчисляване на енергията, необходима за разрушаването на даден обект.
Кратко обяснение, генерирано от езиков модел по текста на CORDIS. Оригиналът е по-долу.
Резултати накратко
New ideas for the Variational Approach to Brittle and Cohesive Fracture
During World War I the aeronautical engineer A.A. Griffith formulated a theory to explain failure of materials, based on the idea that crack growth is the result of the competition between surface energy spent to produce fracture and energy stored in the uncracked region. This found a rigorous mathematical setting in the 'variational formulation for quasistatic evolutions (QSE)' by Francfort-Marigo. They devised, in 1998, a general procedure trough an implicit time-sheme based on energy minimisation, which calls for new techniques in Calculus of Variations. Remarkably, it provided a general framework for also post-Griffith theories, in particular the one due to Barenblatt. Griffith and Barenblatt theories differ in the surface energy dissipated in the fracture: the first is proportional to the measure of the fracture set (surface in 3d, length in 2d), the latter depends also on the amplitude of the opening between the two sides of the crack. Microscopically, in the first case (brittle fracture) any material point is either broken or sound, in the latter (cohesive fracture) restorative forces, depending on the opening, are present between the lips of the crack set. In fact, in formation of cohesive cracks the role of plastic deformations is determinant: these deformations are dissipative (and irreversible), so that the material is not forced to dissipate energy only along cracks and the fracture process is slowed down; in contrast, in brittle fracture the solid is subject only to elastic deformations (reversible) in the uncracked zone, which causes sudden cracks and fast propagation. The application in Numerical Analysis relies on the approximation of fracture energies in terms of so-called damage energies. The minimisation of fracture energies is a classical 'free discontinuity problem', namely it contains a set variable (the crack) as unknown, which makes the numerical simulation hard. In damage models the role of fracture is played by a function variable, supported on a thin 3d-neighborhood of the crack surface, and the resulting energy is more regular in the damage variable. Brittle fracture is approximated by coupling of damage and elasticity, while coupling of damage and elasto-plasticity approximates cohesive fracture (cf. the mechanical interpretation above), in terms of Gamma-convergence, guaranteeing convergence of minima and minimisers of the associated (static) problem. Such approximations, called 'à la Ambrosio-Tortorelli', are nowadays employed in thousands of papers modelling fracture. (In figure, approximation of discontinuity through a smooth profile, restricted to 1d) The overall objective of the project is to progress the mathematical analysis of brittle/cohesive fracture, in synergy with that of the associated damage models.
Текст от CORDIS, на английски · Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз
Цел на проекта
During World War I the English aeronautical engineer A.A. Griffith formulated a theory to explain failure of materials, based on the idea that crack growth is the result of the competition between the surface energy spent to produce the fracture and the energy stored in the uncracked region. Griffith's viewpoint, that by its own nature is variational, found a rigorous mathematical setting in the variational formulation for quasistatic evolutions by Francfort and Marigo, in 1998. Remarkably, this work provides a general framework for several problems in Fracture Mechanics, including post-Griffith theories, in particular the one due to Barenblatt. Griffith and Barenblatt theories differ in the surface energy dissipated in the fracture process: the first is proportional to the measure of fracture set (surface in 3d, length in 2d), the latter depends also on the amplitude of the opening between the two sides of the crack. Microscopically, in the first case (brittle fracture) any material point is either broken or sound, in the latter (cohesive fracture) restorative forces, depending on the opening, are present between the lips of the crack set. Particular choices of cohesive dissipation in the evolution may describe fracture by fatigue.Fatigue occurs when a material degrades by repeated loading and unloading. Fracture by fatigue is extremely dangerous and difficult to predict, since it happens in normal operating conditions without evident warnings. Moreover, it is responsible of about the 90% of failure occurrences. Despite its importance, both the mathematical and the mechanical treatment of fatigue by fracture are much less general than those for brittle fracture.Nevertheless, even the existence of quasistatic evolutions for 3d brittle fracture is still an open problem. This action aims both to prove such existence result with an innovative combination of two apparently alternative approaches, and to explore the rich field of fracture by fatigue.
Оригинален текст от CORDIS (на английски).
Участници
- ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE · PALAISEAU CEDEXКоординаторФранция
Връзки
Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз
