REvolTURN · Managing Migrant Return through 'Voluntariness'
„Хоризонт 2020“ — Действия „Мария Склодовска-Кюри“
- Период
- 2018-10-01 → 2020-09-30
- Финансиране от ЕС
- 166 157 €
- Участници
- 1
- Схема
- MSCA-IF-EF-ST
Линиите свързват координатора с партньорите.
Накратко на български
Политиките за „доброволно връщане“ на мигранти в Австрия и Великобритания анализират дали тези хора наистина избират да си тръгнат или са притиснати. Това помага да се разбере как да се съобразят практиките с етичните стандарти и човешките права.
Кратко обяснение, генерирано от езиков модел по текста на CORDIS. Оригиналът е по-долу.
Резултати накратко
Managing Migrant Return through 'Voluntariness'
The fundamental weakness of nation state and EU efforts to effectively manage migration to Europe lies in ensuring the return of foreigners who pass or avoid border controls but are then neither granted asylum nor a (renewal of their) residence permit. The significant gap between the number of migrants who are officially ordered to return, and that of confirmed departures, strikingly reflects liberal states’ limited capacity to make unwanted foreigners leave their territory. Faced with this problem, many governments rely on public policies for the so-called “voluntary return” of irregular migrants and (refused) asylum seekers. These policies work in tandem with those for the forced removal (deportation) of the same group of people from or between EU Member States. Among scholars it is widely acknowledged that what governments thereby present as “assisted voluntary return (AVR)” is usually not underpinned by genuine voluntariness and leaves very little room for migrant agency and decision-making. Through this research project I wanted to further substantiate and go beyond this claim by investigating the complex role that the politics of voluntary return plays within the Austrian and British return regimes. My research provides important insights into how these approaches work in practice and points out ways to ensure that they are in line with official policy goals, ethical standards, and human rights legislation. The project had three objectives: Firstly, to better understand the role and functioning of voluntariness in the context of state-managed migratory return, thereby contributing to recent scholarship on the in/effectiveness of migration policies, the agency of implementing actors and of migrants holding no or highly precarious statuses. Secondly, to develop a framework for analysing, assessing and comparing such policies with regard to both their effectiveness and legitimacy. Thirdly, to contribute to evidence-based and workable policy solutions that allow for genuinely voluntary returns without undermining the very logic underlying this highly contested approach to unwanted migration. My close and comparative analysis of AVR policies in the two countries focused on the positions and perspectives of various kinds of implementing actors. In particular, I became interested in the complex and changing role of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) providing return-specific advice and counselling. My comparative analysis shows how the recent shift from NGO to state provision of AVR counselling in the UK (2015/16) and in Austria (ongoing) affects the production of voluntariness and the meaning that different actors attach to this principle. Based on detailed empirical evidence including ethnographic insights into the provision of return counselling in Austria and in collaboration with a colleague working in the Netherlands, I have also highlighted the significant variation in how individual return counsellors perceive and (ab)use their own role in relation to their clients’ potential return and aspirations. Together with a colleague from the University of Innsbruck, I have used data from this and a previous research project to provide a theoretical explanation of how and why even social workers become part of a “hostile environment” for irregular migrants and start collaborating with the (British) return regime. The project also allowed me to start linking my own and others’ analyses of the policies and practices of “voluntary return” with critical research on voluntary work with or for refugees, in order to contribute to broader theoretical debates around the governmentality of migration control. What makes “voluntariness” such a crucial element in contemporary migration governance, is that framing certain aspects or instances of it as voluntary can help governments to overcome some of the inherent limitations of state control over unwanted immigration. By giving me the opportunity to conduct this research and engage in the necessary exchanges with other scholars, this fellowship will have an important impact on my career as international scholar and researcher.
Текст от CORDIS, на английски · Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз
Цел на проекта
The fundamental weakness of nation state and EU efforts to effectively manage migration to Europe lies in ensuring the return of foreigners who pass or avoid border controls but are then neither granted asylum nor a residence permit. Many Member States thereby increasingly rely on public policies for the so-called ‘voluntary return’ of irregular migrants and (refused) asylum seekers. Very little is known about how these approaches work in practice and whether they meet stated policy goals and discharge state obligations regarding migrants’ human rights. The project REvolTURN addresses this research gap through a close and comparative analysis of ‘voluntary return’ policies in Austria and the UK, including their adoption, implementation and immediate outcome. It examines 1) how voluntariness of return is constructed and framed in law, policy and public discourse, 2) which notions of voluntariness are crucial for policy implementation, and 3) what impact this has on migrants’ own decision-making about their return. My innovative and interdisciplinary mixed-method approach combines comparative policy and discourse analysis, detailed institutional ethnography through observation and in-depth interviews and a survey among potential returnees. REvolTURN addresses a key priority of the Horizon 2020 work programme for 2016-17: to better manage migration, and will also contribute to recent scholarship regarding the in/effectiveness of migration policies and the agency of migrants holding no or highly precarious statuses. The project has three main objectives: 1) to better understand the role and functioning of voluntariness in the context of state-managed migratory return; 2) to develop a framework for assessing and comparing these roles and functions, including their effectiveness; and 3) to thereby contribute to evidence-based and workable policy solutions that increase the number of genuinely voluntary returns without undermining the very logic underlying this approach.
Оригинален текст от CORDIS (на английски).
Участници
- UNIVERSITAT WIEN · WienКоординаторАвстрия
Връзки
Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз
