H2020Индивидуална стипендия2021–2023

SN1604 · The Ophiucus Supernova: Post-Aristotelian Stargazing in the European Context (1604-1654)

„Хоризонт 2020“ — Действия „Мария Склодовска-Кюри“

Период
2021-01-01 → 2023-12-31
Финансиране от ЕС
269 003 €
Участници
2
Схема
MSCA-IF

Линиите свързват координатора с партньорите.

Накратко на български

Свехновата от 1604 г. в съзвездието Змееносец се анализира чрез трудовете на Галилео, Кеплер и Ричоли. Това помага да се разбере как това небесно събитие е поставило под въпрос аристотеловата представа за непроменяемостта на Вселената.

Този кратък обзор е генериран от изкуствен интелект

Кратко обяснение, генерирано от езиков модел по текста на CORDIS. Оригиналът е по-долу.

Резултати накратко

The Ophiucus Supernova: Post-Aristotelian Stargazing in the European Context (1604-1654)

In October 1604 a giant supernova unexpectedly exploded in the constellation of Ophiuchus and its bright light remained visible to the naked eye for eighteen months. The sudden appearance was an anomalous and stunning event for those observers that conceived the stars as “fixed” and the heavens as unalterable – the accepted position in physics and astronomy at that time. Astronomers as well as astrologers and other stargazers tried to explain the nature and significance of the novelty. The interpretation of the new star was one of the main speculative battlefields where opposing conceptions of the universe collided and its presumed origin was debated at length, from Galileo’s first astronomical studies (1604), passing through Kepler’s magnum opus on the subject (1606), to G.B. Riccioli’s exemplary synthesis fifty years later. As in the case of Tycho’s supernova in 1572 and of the great comet observed in 1577, the appearance of the supernova was deployed as a direct challenge to the physics and cosmology of Aristotle, at a time when all contemporaries either accepted Aristotle’s views or had originally been trained in them. For a growing number of scholars, the supernova of 1604 disputed Aristotle’s doctrine that the heavens and the earth were absolutely distinct, and that all sorts of change could occur only in the region below the moon. The 1604 supernova appeared from nowhere, outshining the planets before declining in brightness and finally disappearing. This should have been impossible for a star, and some interpreters preferred to view it as a meteorological event in the upper reaches of the air. But measurements established that the object was beyond the moon, hence part of the heavens, and hence impossible according to Aristotle’s cosmology. In addition to occasional observers and extemporaneous writers, the interpretation of the supernova involved the most renowned astronomers of the time, some of whom saw it as salient evidence against Aristotle’s theories and in favor of the new astronomical alternatives supported by Kepler and Galileo. Today we know that the naked-eye observation of a supernova’s outburst is an extremely rare event. As a matter of fact, the Ophiuchus supernova was the last supernova that was seen in our galaxy before the telescope was invented. Kepler, Galileo and a multitude of less celebrated observers could witness the exceptional occurrence, leaving their written notes and records behind them. Recovering, studying and enhancing those heterogeneous materials grants us the equally rare privilege of watching the “new star” through their eyes and through their exquisitely baroque mindsets too. The overall objective of SN1604 research project is to achieve a comprehensive understanding of the cultural and scientific impact that the Ophiucus supernova had on European society during and after its impressive outburst –a key moment in the history of astronomy.

Текст от CORDIS, на английски · Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз

Цел на проекта

"The Ophiucus Supernova: Post-Aristotelian Stargazing in the European Context (1604-1654)"" is a research project proposed for a Marie Curie Fellowship by Dr. Matteo Cosci, post-doctoral researcher at the University Ca' Foscari Venice. This research will examine how the unexpected explosion of a supernova in European skies in 1604 (SN 1604 or ""Kepler's supernova"" as it was called) fundamentally affected the development of Renaissance scientific thought from a historical, philosophical and cultural point of view. In fact, for the five decades after its outburst the interpretation of the new star or stella nova was one of the main speculative battlefields where opposing conceptions of the universe collided. The study will be grounded in an extensive set of primary sources and documents assembled by Dr.Cosci and analysed in their entirety for the first time. The first outgoing phase of research will be conducted at the Department of History of Science at University of Oklahoma under the supervision of Prof. Peter Barker, also consulting Dr. Patrick Boner of the Catholic University, Washington D.C . The return phase will take place at the Department of Philosophy and Cultural Heritage at Ca' Foscari under the supervision of Prof. Marco Sgarbi. Moreover, the research will provide data to, and will be assisted by, the Terra-Astronomy research group, based at the University of Jena, Germany, under the supervision of Prof. Ralph Neuhäuser, for assessing the historical supernova's typology and rare features. Results will be presented mainly through a dedicated internet site, a series of peer-reviewed articles in academic journals, and finally a book. The project provides the opportunity to give the proponent additional training for his academic career, to establish collaborations between many research groups working on similar themes in North America and in Europe, and finally to recover and reconsider a neglected chapter of Europen cultural history.""

Оригинален текст от CORDIS (на английски).

Участници

Връзки

Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз