GRADE · Grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendation for health care recommendations (GRADE)
6РП — Действия „Мария Кюри“
- Период
- 2006-09-01 → 2008-08-31
- Финансиране от ЕС
- 80 000 €
- Участници
- 1
- Схема
- EIF
Линиите свързват координатора с партньорите. За проекти отпреди 2014 г. CORDIS не винаги дава точни координати. Тези точки са на ниво град или държава.
Накратко на български
Методологията GRADE създава единни правила за оценка на медицинските доказателства, например при определяне на най-подходящото лечение или диагностика. Това помага на лекарите по целия свят да разбират по-ясно качеството на препоръките и да прилагат най-добрите налични данни в здравеопазването.
Кратко обяснение, генерирано от езиков модел по текста на CORDIS. Оригиналът е по-долу.
Резултати накратко
Final Activity Report Summary - GRADE (Grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendation for health care recommendations)
Clinical practice guidelines are a key tool in providing best healthcare that should be informed by the best available evidence. However, guideline developers around the world are inconsistent in how they rate quality of evidence and grade strength of recommendations. As a result, guideline users face challenges in understanding the messages that grading systems try to communicate. The 'grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation' (GRADE) working group developed and approach that organisations around the world began. The project had four main objectives 1. Develop a user-friendly software application and detailed manual for the application of GRADE methodology in clinical practice guideline projects and evidence grading exercises: This objective is fulfilled. We have completed the development of the software for interventions and are beginning the work on software for diagnostic management. The software is already widely used by international organisations such as the Cochrane Organisation. It is also used by the 'National institutes of health and clinical excellence' (NICE) in the UK and the WHO. A screenshot of the new version of the program is attached. We held several teleconference calls and meetings with members of the Cochrane Collaboration and obtained feedback at meetings 2. Prepare detailed instructions and manuscripts describing the GRADE approach and methodology for diagnosis: We have completed this objective and an article was published in the British Medical Journal. We have held a number of workshops working on this approach and refining it, including in Ottawa, Canada at the 'Canadian agency for drugs and technology in health' (CADTH), in Bilbao, Spain for the Basque guideline effort, at the 'Agency for health care and quality' in US (AHRQ), the Cochrane Colloquium in 2007, the 'Austrian health technology assessment Institute' and other locations around the world. Further workshops are planned for December 2007 at the. A series of 14 articles will be written for the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (agreement with editors obtained) and published in 2009. While this latter series focuses on detailed instructions for guideline developers, the handbook listed in objective 1 includes these instructions in part. 3. Obtain feedback from field application of the products of objectives 1 and 2. We have completed a series of user testing and a study to obtain feedback on the program. This was provided by organisations such as CADTH, NICE, WHO and professional medical societies. 4. Conduct methodological projects related to the GRADE approach. We have begun an official project with the Cochrane Collaboration to measure time and effort involved to complete GRADE summary of findings tables.
Текст от CORDIS, на английски · Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз
Цел на проекта
Grading the strength of recommendations and the quality of underlying evidence enhances the usefulness of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Although CPG have become a reality in healthcare, professional societies and other organizations until recently had not reached consensus about which of the numerous grading systems they should apply. The latter undermines the value of the grading exercise and the implementation of CPGs. In response to this dilemma, the international GRADE Working Group (the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group) reviewed existing grading systems and has developed an approach that is useful for many guideline contexts.The GRADE working group includes some of the worldwide leading clinical epidemiologists and other researchers with diverse backgrounds and skills representing the Cochrane Collaboration, the World Health Organization (WHO), the National Institutes of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the UK, and many other government and academic institutions. The GRADE system has been officially adopted by the World Health Organization (WHO). The GRADE working group now faces demands by various organizations for user-friendly software, tackling diagnostic questions, integration of evidence summaries into existing software and handbooks on how to apply the GRADE approach.This proposal will respond to these demands addressing the following objectives:1. Develop a user-friendly software application and detailed manual for the application of GRADE methodology2. Prepare detailed instructions and manuscripts describing the GRADE approach and methodology for diagnostic guidelines and recommendations3. Obtain feedback from field application of the products from objectives 1 and 2.We will use electronic and direct communication tools to obtain feedback on the work we conduct as part of this proposal. We will also hold a GRADE working group meeting to complete these objectives.
Оригинален текст от CORDIS (на английски).
Участници
- I.F.O. - I.R.E. (ITALIAN NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE REGINA ELENA) · ROMEКоординаторНиво градИталия
Връзки
Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз
