MEMBRANE NANOTUBES · Determining the molecular basis for the formation of membrane nanotubes between immune cells
7РП — „Хора“ (Действия „Мария Кюри“)
- Период
- 2009-09-01 → 2010-08-31
- Финансиране от ЕС
- 91 809 €
- Участници
- 1
- Схема
- MC-IEF
Линиите свързват координатора с партньорите.
Накратко на български
Мембранните нанотръби са тънки връзки между имунни клетки, които се образуват чрез организиран актин. Разбирането на механизмите за създаването им помага да се разбере разликата между тези структури и филоподиите.
Кратко обяснение, генерирано от езиков модел по текста на CORDIS. Оригиналът е по-долу.
Резултати накратко
Determining the molecular basis for the formation of membrane nanotubes between immune cells
The project set out to study the molecular mechanisms of membrane nanotube formation through comparison to filopodia formation. Membrane nanotubes are recently described thin, actin-containing membrane tubes that connect cells. Our data demonstrates that a filopodial tip marker myosin-10 is enriched also in the tips of the membrane nanotubes forming between Jurkat cells. Since myosin-10 preferentially associates to bundled actin on the basis of repeat distance of actin in bundles and accumulates at the ends of structures containing bundled actin (such as filopodia) [Brawley and Rock, 2009, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 9685], the result strongly suggests that Jurkat cell nanotubes contain well-organised, bundled actin. More quantitative analysis demonstrated that GFP-tagged myosin-10 heavy meromyosin construct (GFP-MYO10-HMM) that lacks the tail domains [Berg and Cheney, 2002, Nat. Cell Biol. 4: 246] is enriched in the tips of nanotubes and filopodia to nearly similar extent. GFP-MYO10-HMM overexpression increased the frequency of filopodia formation approx. 5. 3-fold compared to Jurkat transfected with only GFP. This is consistent with an earlier report of approx. 4. 9-fold increase in filopodia numbers in COS7 cells [Tokuo et al., 2007, J. Cell Biol. 179: 229]. Importantly however, the frequency of nanotube formation was unaffected by the overexpression of GFP-MYO10-HMM. We have also overexpressed in Jurkat cells other proteins (IRSp53-I-BAR, IRSp53-full, MIM) that are known to induce filopodia, but found no effect on the numbers of nanotubes. This demonstrates for the first time that there must be differences in the fundamental mechanism of nanotube and filopodia formation, though both appear to contain a backbone of bundled actin filaments. A methodological paper on nanotube work has been published [Sowinski, Alakoskela,, Jolly, and Davis, 2010, Methods in press], and the work on nanotubes in the host laboratory continues. Perhaps the most successful part of the project has been the development and exploitation of new tools for quantitative assessment of size-based segregation in live cell conjugate immunological synapses. We tested the exclusion of fluorescent nanoparticles from synaptic clefts of immunological synapses, and our results show that nanoparticles larger than the intermembrane gap of central synaptic cleft become excluded from the central zone of the synapse. The width of the gap is defined by the lengths of the extracellular domains of immune cell receptors ligated to their ligands on target cells. We assessed the exclusion of membrane-attached fluorescent nanoparticles (diameters 6, 10, 15, 22, and 28 nm) from the central region of immunological synapse formed between an NK cell-like YTS cells transfected to express inhibitory NK cell receptor KIR2DL1 and 721. 221 B cell lymphoma cell line transfected to express HLA-Cw6-GFP. The intermembrane distance is expected to be approx. 15 nm, and, accordingly, membrane bending elasticity-originated forces are expected to drive the exclusion of particles larger than 15 nm from the central zone of the synapse, with the level of exclusion increasing with the size of the particle, in agreement with our results. We estimated the effect of lateral crowding from scaled particle theory [Chatelier and Minton, 1996, Biophys. J. 71: 2367] and found that it cannot explain the exclusion of large particles. Our results demonstrate that size-based exclusion in immune synapses is not dependent on the interactions of protein cytoplasmic tails with actin cytoskeleton, but that the size of extracellular domain is sufficient to drive segregation, as predicted by membrane bending elasticity considerations playing important role in kinetic-segregation model of immune cell activation (Davis and van der Merwe, 2006, Nat. Immunol. 7: 803). A manuscript of the results is currently in preparation for a top specialist journal, and is expected to be submitted during November 2010.
Текст от CORDIS, на английски · Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз
Цел на проекта
Recently, membrane nanotubes have been found to connect many types of cells, including cells of the immune system. These nanotubes contain actin filaments, are not attached to substrate, and are distinct from other cell tethers such as filopodia and membrane bridges. Potentially, specific coupling of cells over long distances can have great significance, and evidence is mounting to suggest that membrane nanotubes may have a role, e.g., in specific cell-to-cell signalling and trafficking of pathogens between cells. However, the molecular basis for the nanotubes formation is almost completely unknown. This is an urgent goal for research in this area since functional tests for the importance of membrane nanotubes are currently hampered by a lack of knowledge regarding specific ways to inhibit or augment nanotube formation. Thus, I aim to address this issue by answering three specific questions: 1) Does the formation of membrane nanotubes and filopodia require the same proteins? This will be assessed by knocking-down the production of proteins involved in filopodia formation, and observing the frequency of nanotube formation, their length, and their stability. In parallel I will test for the presence of these proteins in membrane nanotubes using mAb and/or fluorescent protein-tagged proteins as available. 2) Next I will test whether proteins known to be involved in the morphological changes the underlie immune cell spreading and contraction are required for the formation of the nanotubes. The effects of these proteins will be tested by knocking-down proteins and additionally, changes in cytoskeletal and membrane tension that are coupled to changes in cytoskeleton reorganization will be evaluated using optical tweezers. 3) Finally, I will test if the membrane protein and lipid composition in nanotubes is different from that in the rest of the cell surface membrane. If a specific composition is revealed, this may imply specific functions for the nanotube membrane.
Оригинален текст от CORDIS (на английски).
Участници
- IMPERIAL COLLEGE OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND MEDICINE · LondonКоординаторОбединеното кралство
Връзки
Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз
