FP7Индивидуална стипендия2009–2012

REPROEVOL · Sperm competition and the evolution of the male reproductive genome: a case study in the nannoptera group of Drosophila

7РП — „Хора“ (Действия „Мария Кюри“)

Период
2009-08-01 → 2012-01-31
Финансиране от ЕС
171 301 €
Участници
1
Схема
MC-IEF

Линиите свързват координатора с партньорите.

Накратко на български

Поведението при чифтосването на дрозофилите показва как мъжките променят продължителността на акта, когато имат конкуренти. Това помага да се разбере как се е развил репродуктивният геном на насекомите и защо се променя поведението им.

Този кратък обзор е генериран от изкуствен интелект

Кратко обяснение, генерирано от езиков модел по текста на CORDIS. Оригиналът е по-долу.

Резултати накратко

Sperm competition and the evolution of the male reproductive genome: a case study in the nannoptera group of Drosophila

REPROEVOL: The evolution of Reproductive systems in insects Marie Curie Fellow: Dr Anne Lise; Researcher in Charge: Prof. Greg Hurst Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool. Contact: g. hurst@liv. ac. uk or a. lise@liv. ac. uk Our project addressed the causes and consequences of variation in the rate at which females remate in insects, and the impact this has on the evolution of male behaviour. We utilised flies of the genus Drosophila as these: a) Are easy to rear in the laboratory and perform realistic behavioural experiments on. b) Have a variety of mating systems, including species where females mate once in their life, and species where females mate daily c) Have excellent knowledge of their genomic constitution from genome sequencing studies. We made five principle findings: i) Plasticity in male mating behaviour is not confined to species where females mate multiply. Previous work by another group had demonstrated that male D. melanogaster would mate for longer with a female when they were maintained with a competitor prior to mating. Extended mating gave males the opportunity to increase their success in competition with later males that mated with the same female. This creates the prediction that mating plasticity should be found in species where females mate multiply, but not where they mate singly. We demonstrated that mating plasticity was not confined to species where females mate multiply, but was also observed (and observed more strongly) in species where females mated just once. This indicates that our initial understanding of male behaviour was either wrong or partial. ii) Plasticity in male mating behaviour is an evolvable trait. The study above suggested that plasticity in male mating behaviour might be a'universal'in Drosophila, and not an evolved trait. We tested this in the sap feeding fruit fly Drosophila bifasciata, which has a very different ecology from species previously tested. We revealed this species did not show any plasticity in male mating behaviour – males kept confined with females had the same characteristics during mating as males kept separately. We observed that this species is one where there is a physical mating plug that prevents females from remating, and hypothesize this adaptation alleviates the need for plasticity in mating behaviour. iii) Plasticity in male mating behaviour in species where females mate once is associated with male-male competition This study was a'follow up'to finding one. Why did males in species where female mate singly mate for longer when maintained with a competitor? We hypothesized that this may be driven by raised intensity of male-male competition in species where females mate just once, which renders them'tired'. We tested this by examining whether males in these species showed reduced success at obtaining a mate, either alone or in competition, than males in species where females mate multiply (and thus the intensity of male-male competition is lower). This hypothesis was verified. In species where males mated just once, males that had been in competition with other males obtained a mate less commonly both when given free access, and when in competition with a male that had not been exposed to competition before mating. Thus, we can conclude that male mating behaviour is influence by both pre-and post-copulatory sexual selection. iv) Thermal environment is a key determinant of female remating rate. What determines the rate at which females remate and their lifetime number of mating partners? Past work had examined this issue in terms of sexual conflict – manipulation of female behaviour by males – and the benefits of multiply mating to females. In insects, thermal environment is commonly variable – both seasonally and spatially – and likely to change with global climate shifts. We reasoned that, as insects are cold blooded, and activity varies with temperature, different thermal environments would alter female remating rates. We tested the degree to which this was true, examining the effect of temperature during courtship on remating propensity, and the effect of temperature outside of courtship. Both factors were found to influence remating rate, with temperature at the point of courtship being the most important. Overall, a 10 degree rise in temperature was associated with a 3 fold increase in mating rate by females. Thus, thermal environment is a key determinant of mating biology in insects. v) Male reproductive transcriptome varies between monandrous and polyandrous species. Where females mate multiply, males experience sperm competition, where their sperm is alongside the sperm of other males in the reproductive tract competing for fertilisation. As a result, males have evolved to place a number of small protein chemicals in the accessory fluid alongside sperm that improve their ability in sperm competition. We reasoned that if this logic were correct, the accessory fluid of males in species where females did not mate multiply would be more simple than in species where they did. We examined this through developing genomic methods to profile the genes expressed in accessory glands, where these proteins are produced, and applied these to males from species with different mating systems. We have successfully developed these methods (and have validated them on a species with a polyandrous mating system), and are currently awaiting the profile from males from species where females mate just once. Project deliverables: We have to date published three papers on our work, with a further three in preparation. The work has been widely profiled in the press. http://io9.com/5828809/on-the-paranoid-mating-of-fruit-flies http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/08/110808104524.htm . The work informs us about a very basic aspect of insect ecology – mating rate. Mating rate is a very important parameter in insect control using sterile male release, and this project will inform strategies for control in the field. Details of Dr Lise's work can be found at: http://tinyurl.com/6o8lhv7.

Текст от CORDIS, на английски · Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз

Цел на проекта

Sperm competition is known to affect many aspects of animal behaviour and anatomy. In this proposal, I will examine how the threat of sperm competition is reflected in the complexity of male ejaculates, and in the rate of evolution of the components of this ejaculate. My core hypothesis is that loss of sperm competition will be reflected in ejaculates that are less complex (as they do not have to function in maximizing success in sperm competition) and evolve less quickly (as they are not driven by recurrent selection from male-male conflicts). Using D. wassermani and D. nannoptera, two polyandrous species, and D. acanthoptera, a monandrous species, of the less-known Drosophila nannoptera group, I will examine how the gene set involved with male reproduction alters between polyandrous and monandrous species, and compare the evolutionary rate of genes involved with male reproduction in the different species. This will involve a) Using 454 sequencing to establish EST sets for accessory glands and testes for each species, and establish genes involved with male reproduction in each species. b) Comparing EST set membership between monandrous and polyandrous species, and between polyandrous species. c) Examining the level of divergence of the subset of genes involved with male reproduction. I will specifically test: a) Whether certain genes involved with male reproduction are lost following transition to monandry, and associated loss of sperm competition. b) Whether the rate of positive selection in genes involved in male reproduction is lower in the lineage leading to D. acanthoptera, associated with reduction in the intensity of sexual conflict. c) Whether genes involved with male reproduction present in all species (core genes) evolve more slowly than genes present only in polyandrous species that are likely to function in sperm competition.

Оригинален текст от CORDIS (на английски).

Участници

Връзки

Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз