FP7Индивидуална стипендия2011–2013

BIOCORE · Risks of global warming: the case of coral reef ecosystems in developing countries

7РП — „Хора“ (Действия „Мария Кюри“)

Период
2011-03-01 → 2013-05-31
Финансиране от ЕС
158 259 €
Участници
1
Схема
MC-IEF

Линиите свързват координатора с партньорите.

Накратко на български

Коралните рифове в развиващите се страни се анализират през призмата на глобалното затопляне и туристическите услуги, като например гмуркането. Резултатите помагат за създаване на по-добри политики за управление и възстановяване на тези екосистеми.

Този кратък обзор е генериран от изкуствен интелект

Кратко обяснение, генерирано от езиков модел по текста на CORDIS. Оригиналът е по-долу.

Резултати накратко

Risks of global warming: the case of coral reef ecosystems in developing countries

The BIOCORE project was assessing the impact of the coral reef values obtained from various threats, particularly global warming, the results of which being aimed at influencing policy programmes regarding the management of them. The project had several key objectives covering understanding of the use values attached to recreational services, how climate change as linked to coral bleaching, affect the user’s support for coral reef ecosystem recovery and resilience. Three major achievements were obtained from this work, namely: • A comprehensive global database of coral reef literature related to recreational benefits was compiled • An estimated value transfer was developed to evaluate various income levels of countries where methodological biases have been found in the coral reef valuation literature • A methodological approach to estimating and evaluating a distinct vulnerability index of nations was devised • A global survey related to recreational services, i.e. diving, was completed to assess the impact of coral bleaching under various management programmes, including coral reef restoration as well as marine protected areas (MPAs). The main results include: 1. Stated preference biases/effects inflate willingness to pay (WTP) for both high and low income economies, was the outcomes were more pronounced for low income economies where the inflated bias rate was found to be 110% as compared with 48% for rich income economies. 2. Vulnerability indices (VIs) levels differ between developed and developing countries, with Australia having low ones when compared with Thailand or Indonesia and China had the highest of all. The declining trend in VI scores among countries indicates that there has been a learning curve across the relevant, i.e. countries have been intervening better after social or economic shocks. 3. The economic benefit relating to scuba-diving in the MPAs was estimated at US$13 per dive, although these values depend on the support from users as well as the total number of visitors to the, with both factors being important in relation to covering the administration and implementation costs of MPAs. 4. The benefit outcomes of coral reef restoration programmes after coral bleaching events at the global level reveal that for high coral coverage the value stands at US$40/ha, whereas for low coral coverage areas this was estimated at US$95/ha. Therefore, it is important that greater efforts are made to maintain the corals, in particular, the ecological state of low coverage areas before it becomes it too expensive to do so when the system is on the verge of collapse. The BIOCORE project is relevant at the policy level in three distinct ways: Firstly, analysis of the extant literature on coral reef systems that has used valuation approaches has revealed that benefit transfer estimations are biased. Indeed, if such biases are not accounted for when transferring values from study to policy sites, then these will be over or under-estimated depending on type of biases. Secondly, given the construction of vulnerability indices involved using three different calculation methods that were compared to identify their particular strengths and weaknesses, this can assist planners or researchers in the future to select the essential given components when estimating vulnerability related to human well-being. Thirdly, by estimating the benefit values associated with coral reef restoration as well as MPAs after coral bleaching events, this provides policy makers with reference values to improve the ecological functions of the coral reef ecosystem by establishing feasible pricing strategies for users. Moreover, such values can help planners as well as researchers in ecological and recreational modeling when calculating the cost of policy inaction when faced with threats, such as climate change.

Текст от CORDIS, на английски · Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз

Цел на проекта

This proposal will seek to examine biological diversity with particular reference to coral reef ecosystems to the environment, economy and human well-being. Coral reef ecosystems are reported to be the richest bio-diverse group in the world and from the socio-economic view; they are mainly located in developing countries. The cost of policy inaction will result to 60% corals reef loss by 2030 resulting to significant, and potentially irreversible welfare losses to the future generations.Objectives:1-To develop conceptual framework to examine welfare impacts on biodiversity and coral reef ecosystem2-To link society, economy, environment to ecosystem by incorporating socio- economic and demographic factors3-To evaluate welfare impacts by simulating policy conservation programmes for environment, economy and people’s wellbeing4-To deliver policy suggestions to value ecosystems and promote dissemination portal among all stakeholdersOutput:-Interactive web-based database and mapping tool to access data collected and to visualize the value of biodiversity and ecosystem conservation programs linked to human welfare and poverty alleviation-Specific education and dissemination activities for coral reef protection and coordination from organizations such as: Conservation International, International Coral Reef Action Network and UNEP World Conservation Monitoring CentreBenefits:1-Society: identification of socio-economic and demographic datasets will provide a better understanding how these factors impact conservation2-Economy: estimation of economic benefits coral ecosystems will assist in minimizing losses and ensure sustainable management and conservation3-Institution: network opportunity with European and international researchers for immediate and future collaboration; and in Europe, policy action in conserving, mitigating and awareness campaigns on coral ecosystems will strengthen international co-operation, development and security

Оригинален текст от CORDIS (на английски).

Участници

  • FONDAZIONE ENI ENRICO MATTEI · MilanoКоординаторИталия

Връзки

Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз