FP7Индивидуална стипендия2011–2013

ForcedTrust · Forced Trust: Emotional Bonds between People and State in Soviet Russia (1917-1991), A History of Trust and Mistrust

7РП — „Хора“ (Действия „Мария Кюри“)

Период
2011-09-01 → 2013-08-31
Финансиране от ЕС
209 593 €
Участници
1
Схема
MC-IEF

Линиите свързват координатора с партньорите.

Накратко на български

Емоционалните връзки между гражданите и държавата в Съветска Русия (1917–1991) се анализират чрез примери като култа към Сталин. Това помага да се разбере как се създава и разрушава доверието между хората и политическия режим.

Този кратък обзор е генериран от изкуствен интелект

Кратко обяснение, генерирано от езиков модел по текста на CORDIS. Оригиналът е по-долу.

Резултати накратко

Forced Trust: Emotional Bonds between People and State in Soviet Russia (1917-1991), A History of Trust and Mistrust

The Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship for Career Development was crucial experience in terms of training in research and academic management, networking and knowledge transfer. The Fellow has achieved important goals: 1. Publications: During the fellowship the researcher has published two peer-reviewed articles in leading journals in the field of Russian/Soviet studies: a) Tikhomirov A. (2013): The Regime of Forced Trust: Making and Breaking of Emotional Bonds Between People and State in Soviet Russia, 1917-1941, in: The Slavonic and East European Review, Special Issue “Trust and Distrust in the USSR”, Vol. 91, No. 1 (January 2013), 78-118. b) Tikhomirov A. (2012): Symbols of Power in Rituals of Violence: The Personality Cult and Iconoclasm on the Soviet Empire’s Periphery (East Germany, 1945-61), in: Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, Vol. 13, No.1 (Winter 2012), 47-88. He has completed his first monograph “Luchshii drug nemetskogo naroda”: kul’t Stalina v Vostochnoi Germanii (1945-1961 gg.) [“The Best Friend of the German People”: The Stalin Cult in East Germany, 1945-1961] based on PhD-Thesis, which will be published by ROSSPEN in a prestigious series “History of Stalinism” in due course. He is currently working on two articles: a) Tikhomirov A., Care, Sensitivity and Trust: the Paradox of Stability of the Soviet Political Order in Brezhnev’s Russia, for: Cahiers du Monde russe. b) The Russian translation of The Regime of Forced Trust: Making and Breaking of Emotional Bonds Between People and State in Soviet Russia, 1917-1941 for the peer-reviewed journal “Neprikosnovennii Zapas”, to be published in January 2014. 2. Research: The fellow has started his proposed project and focused the chronological framework from 1917 to 1941. First, he worked with the theoretical literature on trust and distrust from a multidisciplinary perspective (social and political sciences, psychology). Second, he read literature on Soviet history and deepened his expertise in the history of trust/distrust with deep roots in early Modern European history. Third, he collected and analysed published sources (published collections of letters of ordinary people to Soviet authorities, newspapers – “Pravda” and “Izvestia”, published collections of party documents, propaganda literature on trust and letter writing published in the Soviet Union). All three research steps were done in the first-class library of the School of Slavonic and East European Studies, UCL. Moreover, the researcher travelled twice to Russia and collected original (non-published) sources from Russian central and regional archives. Letters of Soviet citizens to state and party leaders were collected from the Russian State Archive of Contemporary History (RGANI), the Russian State Archive of Social and Political History (RGASPI), the State Archive of Russian Federation (GARF) and the Yaroslavl’ Party Archive. As a result, the fellow has written two chapters of his future book on the history of trust and distrust taking Soviet Russia as a case study. Monthly, the fellow met the scientist in charge to discuss research progress. Also emeritus Professor Geoffrey Hosking and Professor Alena Ledeneva provided help and advice at different stages of the project. The friendly, collegial and supportive climate in SSEES has helped the fellow to integrate very well into the UCL academic community and provided exchange of views from multiple interdisciplinary perspectives. 3. Academic management The researcher organized an interdisciplinary panel “At the boundary of trust and distrust: the shifting of normality and deviance in Soviet Russia” at the ASSEES Annual Convention in New Orleans, 15-18 November 2012. Dr. Tikhomirov organized a peer-reviewed international conference “Trust and Distrust in The Eastern Bloc and the Soviet Union, 1956-1991” at UCL (4-5 July 2013). He was successful in securing funding for this academic event (£5000 from UCL Grand Challenges of Intercultural Interaction and £3000 from SSEES conference grant). Thanks for organizing this conference, the fellow established international contacts with scholars from Central and Eastern Europe. He is going to publish the conference proceedings with a leading publishing house (a proposal was submitted to the Indiana University Press, Series “Indiana-Michigan Series in Russian and East European Studies”). He became a member of two important, international professional organisations - the Association for Slavic, East European and Eurasian Studies (ASEEES) and the British Association of Slavonic and East European Studies (BASEES), a crucial step to improve knowledge transfer, networking and integration into the world-wide academic community.

Текст от CORDIS, на английски · Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз

Цел на проекта

Trust is an essential part of individual lives and the workings of modern society. Not only democracies, but also dictatorships like the Soviet state and authoritarian regimes like postwar European socialist societies needed trust as a crucial resource for social integration and stability of political order. But how much trust did a dictatorship need to ensure the regime’s viability? How did the propaganda state produce the trust necessary to legitimate itself? How did the population experience trust and mistrust in the insecurities of everyday life? Answers to those questions are important to understand problems of democratic transition in post-communist countries and to explain how neo-authoritarian systems are produced today. My project, a cultural history of trust and mistrust in Soviet Russia 1917-1991, is the first historical study to illuminate the role of emotions in organizing states and societies. I hypothesize that the Soviet state preserved social cohesion with the paradoxical principle of forced trust: the bureaucratic system’s ineffectiveness made people feel defenseless, compelling them to mistrust official institutions and join networks of forced trust under local patrons with ultimate protection from the head of state. Taking a constructivist approach, I treat trust and mistrust as socially constructed, politically directed feelings. I.e., trust and mistrust changed over time. The language, symbols, rituals and meanings adhering to these emotions reveal that they influenced history and have their own history. Trust and mistrust were moreover products of political communication during which actors struggled for status and resources in networks of forced trust, established hierarchies and regulated processes of inclusion and exclusion. Wide ranging archival and published sources allow reconstruction of intersections between state production, representation and construction of trust and mistrust and individual experience, memory and social practices.

Оригинален текст от CORDIS (на английски).

Участници

Връзки

Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз