SignLearnSpeak · Examining the relationship between linguistic- and non-linguistic cognitive processes in deaf children's vocabulary development in spoken and signed vocabulary
7РП — „Хора“ (Действия „Мария Кюри“)
- Период
- 2011-08-08 → 2014-08-19
- Финансиране от ЕС
- 245 579 €
- Участници
- 1
- Схема
- MC-IOF
Линиите свързват координатора с партньорите.
Накратко на български
Процесите по усвояване на речника при глухи деца се анализират чрез сравнение между жестовия и spoken езика, например чрез сортиране на предмети по цвят или форма. Това помага да се разбере езиковият потенциал на децата и как социалният натиск подобрява обучението им.
Кратко обяснение, генерирано от езиков модел по текста на CORDIS. Оригиналът е по-долу.
Резултати накратко
Examining the relationship between linguistic- and non-linguistic cognitive processes in deaf children's vocabulary development in spoken and signed vocabulary
The goal of the SIGNLEARNSPEAK (SLS) project was to develop and pilot dynamic assessment procedures with signing deaf children to gain insight into their language learning process. Dynamic assessment combines teaching and assessment within a single assessment procedure to measure language potential and evaluate the enhanced performance that results from teaching. It is based on the idea that successful learning takes place through social interaction. Accordingly, a child working together with a more advanced adult or peer can develop higher mental functioning skills. So far, dynamic language assessment has been mostly used with hearing children from nonmainstream backgrounds. SIGNLEARNSPEAK is the first study to use dynamic language assessment with signing deaf populations and explore differences in deaf children’s language learning profiles. A test-teach-retest design was used by which deaf children completed vocabulary tasks in American Sign Language (ASL) and English and participated in one-on-one interactions, referred to as Mediated Learning Experiences (MLE) with a hearing adult fluent in ASL and English. During the first year of the study, the team developed the vocabulary tasks for the test/re-test measures. These were adapted from another signed language, British Sign Language (BSL), and had been developed previously by the project coordinator. The team also developed the activities for the MLEs one targeting vocabulary knowledge in ASL, the other targeting vocabulary knowledge in English. . For the MLEs targeting ASL, the activities included sorting by size, colour and shape and/or matching pictures/ASL signs based on category membership (e.g., apple, strawberry = fruit);. The materials for these activities were piloted with a small sample. During the second year of the study, 37 deaf children, including 11 children, who had been identified as weak language users,,were tested. They were randomly assigned to a mediation or non-mediation group. Children in the non-mediation group received the MLEs after completing the pre- and post-tests. In addition, a control group of 89 age-matched hearing children completed the English vocabulary tasks and two of the ASL tasks. The control did not participate in the MLEs. Preliminary findings revealed that the ASL vocabulary tasks were age The goal of the SIGNLEARNSPEAK (SLS) project is to develop and pilot dynamic assessment procedures with signing deaf children to gain insight into their language learning process. Dynamic assessment combines teaching and assessment within a single assessment procedure to measure language potential and evaluate the enhanced performance that results from teaching. It is based on the idea that successful learning takes place through social interaction. Accordingly, a child working together with a more advanced adult or peer can develop higher mental functioning skills. So far, dynamic language assessment has been mostly used with hearing children from nonmainstream backgrounds. SIGNLEARNSPEAK is the first study to use dynamic language assessment with signing deaf populations and explore differences in deaf children’s language learning profiles. A test-teach-retest design was used by which deaf children completed vocabulary tasks in American Sign Language (ASL) and English and participated in one-on-one interactions, referred to as Mediated Learning Experiences (MLE) with a hearing adult fluent in ASL and English. During the first year of the study, the team developed the vocabulary tasks for the test/re-test measures. These were adapted from another signed language, British Sign Language (BSL), and had been developed previously by the project coordinator. The team also developed the activities for the MLEs one targeting vocabulary knowledge in ASL, the other targeting vocabulary knowledge in English. . For the MLEs targeting ASL, the activities included sorting by size, colour and shape and/or matching pictures/ASL signs based on category membership (e.g., apple, strawberry = fruit);. The materials for these activities were piloted with a small sample. During the second year of the study, 37 deaf children, including 11 children, who had been identified as weak language users,,were tested. They were randomly assigned to a mediation or non-mediation group. Children in the non-mediation group received the MLEs after completing the pre- and post-tests. In addition, a control group of 89 age-matched hearing children completed the English vocabulary tasks and two of the ASL tasks. The control did not participate in the MLEs. Preliminary findings revealed that the ASL vocabulary tasks were age sensitive and correlated with each other, even when age is controlled for. With regard to the dynamic assessment procedures, children in the mediation showed significant gains in their post-test vocabulary performance, compared to the no-mediation control group, whose performance on the tests did not differ significantly. In addition, both strong and weak language users benefited from the mediation. Mediators rated children’s emotional behaviour (e.g., motivation) and cognitive strategies (e.g., error correction) at the end of each session. These ratings showed that cognitive strategies were the strongest predictors of language ability. During the final year of the project, the focus was on dissemination of the findings and training. This included publications in peer-reviewed journals, book chapters, presentations at (inter-)national conferences, talks/workshops for non-academic audiences (parents, clinicians), organization of community events (ERSC Festival of Social Science). Training was received in the areas of writing/publishing, leadership, and public engagement. The possibility of a computer adaptive version of the vocabulary assessments that were developed over the course of the fellowship will be explored as part of a proposal for a ERC consolidator research grant, submitted by the project leader earlier this year. In continuing project work, the researchers will investigate deaf children’s performance on the English vocabulary tasks and the MLEs targeting vocabulary knowledge in English. In addition, deaf children’s performance on the ASL tasks will be compared to hearing children’s performance on the English vocabulary tasks. The next step will be to administer the tasks/MLEs to a larger sample of deaf children with hearing parents, who represent the majority of this population. This is also part of the submitted ERC grant proposal. Once the tasks have been standardized and normed on a larger sample, they will be made available to schools where the information they provide can guide teachers in deciding which area of students’ vocabulary needs to be supported.
Текст от CORDIS, на английски · Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз
Цел на проекта
This project is an investigation into the relationship between linguistic and –non-linguistic cognitive processes, comparing the spoken and signed language vocabulary of deaf children.Objectives are: (1) to contribute to our knowledge of modality effects on linguistic structure; (2) to contribute to the theoretical debate on the issue of language modularity; (3) to gain insight how mediated learning experiences can inform deaf children’s organization of their signed and spoken language systems; (4) to provide a model of how language learning occurs in deaf children in a short and very structured way. To receive objectives 1 and 2, deaf children’s understanding of different form-meaning mappings in signed and spoken language will be assessed during step 1 ; stimuli include vocabulary tasks and a rating scale to measure mode of acquisition of word meanings. To receive objectives 3 and 4, a test-teach-test paradigm is used in step 2, which includes the combined use of static (i.e., vocabulary test) and dynamic (i.e., mediated learning) assessments. By acquiring training and expertise at both host universities, the applicant will be in a position to effectively disseminate his expertise on an international level in his further expertise in research and teaching within the EU. The spreading of this expertise within the European Research Area will help establish successful co-ordination and co-operation across national borders. Furthermore, the project will make an important contribution to the development of appropriate assessment and intervention for young deaf language users. Long-term, this work will help to enable deaf graduates to pursue a degree in Higher Education and, possibly, a career in science. This has direct relevance to one of the main objectives of the People Specific Programme, which is a strong focus on the quantity and quality of its human resources and the effort to make Europe more attractive, as well as more equally accessible, to researchers.
Оригинален текст от CORDIS (на английски).
Участници
- CITY ST GEORGES UNIVERSITY OF LONDON · LONDONКоординаторОбединеното кралство
Връзки
Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз
