FP7Индивидуална стипендия2011–2013

IAGPH · Indeterminacy and Argument in Greek Philosophy: An Alternative Metaphysics in Protagoras, Pyrrho and in the Socratic Schools (traditionally named as 'minor').""

7РП — „Хора“ (Действия „Мария Кюри“)

Период
2011-09-05 → 2013-09-04
Финансиране от ЕС
236 547 €
Участници
1
Схема
MC-IEF

Линиите свързват координатора с партньорите.

Накратко на български

Неопределеността в античната гръцка философия се анализира чрез идеите на Протагор, Пирон и някои от Сократовите школи. Работата по фрагментирани текстове и папируси помага за по-точното разбиране на метафизичния принос на тези мислители.

Този кратък обзор е генериран от изкуствен интелект

Кратко обяснение, генерирано от езиков модел по текста на CORDIS. Оригиналът е по-долу.

Резултати накратко

Indeterminacy and Argument in Greek Philosophy: An Alternative Metaphysics in Protagoras, Pyrrho and in the Socratic Schools (traditionally named as 'minor').

Final Scientific Report (‪276176‬ ‪IAGPH‬) The project on indeterminacy in ancient Greek philosophy has now seen its end. The following final report will explain and comment on the main scholarly results obtained by the fellow in the actual elaboration of the project. 1) Main Topic in its general lines The project was centred on the crucial notion of indeterminacy in ancient Greek philosophy, in particular on the philosophical role that the notion played in the thought of the sophist Protagoras, the Socratic schools of the Cyrenaics and the Megarians and of the actual beginner of ancient scepticism, Pyrrho of Elis. 2) Key-philosophers in the project and new acquired skills Large part of the project was devoted to provide a full—both historical and philosophical—assessment of the theoretical contribution of the Cyrenaics and the Megarians, two extremely important Socratic schools that it is hard to come to terms with philosophically. This is so because there are many ancient sources dealing with those Socratic thinkers; yet, it is hard to offer a coherent picture of those sources, given the fragmentary state of the evidence. In short, the scholar who aims at providing a new, fresher interpretation of the philosophical contribution of the Cyrenaics and the Megarians has to work heavily both on the philological and philosophical side. This project has enabled the fellow to do so in light of the new skills acquired during the actual elaboration of the project. As far as philology is concerned, the fellow has learned much in terms of how to deal with ancient texts and papyri that are damaged or corrupted. In more philosophical terms, the fellow has widened much his own understanding of indeterminacy by reading extensively in contemporary metaphysics, so to articulate the project along metaphysical line (in this connection, the fellow has made research trips to Dublin, to develop a new research project: see below). 3) Main outcomes of the project The main outcomes of the project are actually the following four ones: two books (The Cyrenaics, Acumen: Durham, Ancient philosophies Series, 2012, paperback edition 2013; Megarians and Dialecticians, Acumen: Durham, Ancient philosophies Series; forthcoming 2014), an edited collection on the Socratics (The Socratics and the Socratic schools, Acumen: Durham, Ancient philosophies Series, forthcoming 2014) and an International conference on the Socratic schools (‘The Philosophical relevance of the Socratic schools’, Soprabolzano, 26-8 September 2013). See under dissemination. 4) Other outcomes During the project, the fellow has contributed articles for Cambridge University Press, Brill and Akademia Verlag (see under the publications list) and has presented oral contribution in international venues (Italy, UK, Finland, France: again, see under dissemination in this report). 6) Further scientific development of the fellow. In the two years of the fellowship, the fellow has become an important figure in the study of the Socratic schools, mainly by means of his publications and presentations. In light of this acquired professional maturity, the fellow has just been asked by the Board of the Oxford Bibliography online in Classics (Prof. Clayman being the head of the board) to write a comprehensive article on ‘Minor Socratics’. At the same time, Prof. George Boys-Stones (Durham University), the new editor of the Routledge Series ‘Issues in ancient philosophy’ has asked the fellow to contribute a comprehensive and systematic monograph on the Socratic schools. The provisional title of the book is ‘Philosophy beyond Socrates’ Athens. Cyrenaics, Cynics, Megarians and Elians’ and the final manuscript for review has to be handed in by June 2015. The fellow has made a research trip to Durham to discuss this new project with Prof. Boys-Stones. Relying on the scientific and professional development acquired during the tenure of this fellowship, the fellow has been able to develop a new, more ambitious project on metaphysical indeterminacy in ancient and contemporary philosophy, which will be the focus of his new research agenda. The project has scored well in the recent ERC Consolidator Grant scheme and is now under consideration for another Marie Curie grant, to work with the leading metaphysician Peter Simons, in Dublin. At the same time, the fellow has been contacted by American Universities that are now interested in his profile.

Текст от CORDIS, на английски · Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз

Цел на проекта

This project aims to unearth the full philosophical importance of Protagoras, Pyrrho and of two Socratic schools (the Cyrenaics and the Megarians) from the shadows imposed on them by modern traditional scholarship, by focussing on the key-idea of metaphysical indeterminacy.Metaphysical indeterminacy is the radical view that reality is inherently without any fixed ontological structure on its own: things in the world do not have any intrinsic essence on their own. The project at issue here proposes to understand the significance of metaphysical indeterminacy (as well as reconstructing the logic through which indeterminacy is both argued for and contrasted to) in the context of the thought of Protagoras, the Socratic schools of the Cyrenaics and the Megarians and of Pyrrho, in the crucial period of time spanning from the fifth to the end of the fourth century B.C. In so doing, a challenging interpretation of the philosophical weight to be attached to the figures and schools just referred to will be proposed. It will be argued that these figures and schools delivered a metaphysical model of reality that was philosophically appealing, in so long as it provided a forceful alternative to the Platonic/Aristotelian view of reality.The novelty of the proposed project is that it first identifies a view, such as indeterminacy, as an essential metaphysical position to be evaluated in Greek philosophy and, secondly, that it makes such a view as the common element around which Protagoras, the Cyrenaics, the Megarians and Pyrrho constructed their different—yet germane—doctrines, hence offering a quite innovative reading of both the philosophical relations between these somehow underestimated thinkers and of their respective importance in the context of Ancient thought.""

Оригинален текст от CORDIS (на английски).

Участници

  • UNIVERSITA DI PISA · PisaКоординаторИталия

Връзки

Данни: CORDIS, © Европейски съюз